PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing7 citationsOpen Access

Processing and Development of Porous Titanium for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review

View Full Paper
YAYudha AdityaVPVaibhav PandeyCPChandra S. Perugu

Key Points

  • This review examines the development of porous titanium for enhanced biomedical applications.
  • Comprehensive review of powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing for porous titanium fabrication.
  • Comparison of processing routes by porosity, pore size distribution, and mechanical properties.
  • Integration of bone biology with engineering to relate porous structures to implant performance.
  • Optimized techniques achieve interconnected pores from 100 to 500 μm for osseointegration.
  • Demonstrated compressive strengths between 50 and 300 MPa.
  • Additive manufacturing allows precise control of microstructural characteristics but requires thorough post-processing.

Abstract

Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are widely used in orthopedic applications, including total hip and knee replacements, bone plates, and dental implants, because of their superior biocompatibility, bioactivity, corrosion resistance, and mechanical robustness. These alloys effectively overcome several limitations of conventional metallic implants, such as 316L stainless steel and Co-Cr alloys, particularly with respect to corrosion, fatigue performance, and biological response. However, dense Ti alloys possess a relatively high elastic modulus, which can cause stress shielding in load-bearing applications. This challenge has motivated significant research toward engineered porous Ti structures that exhibit a reduced and bone-matched modulus while preserving adequate mechanical integrity. This review provides a comprehensive examination of powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing approaches used to fabricate porous Ti and Ti-alloy scaffolds, including additive manufacturing and different powder metallurgy techniques. Processing routes are compared in terms of achievable porosity, pore size distribution, microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and biological outcomes, with emphasis on the relationship between processing parameters, pore architecture, and functional performance. The reported findings indicate that optimized powder-metallurgy techniques can generate interconnected pores in the 100–500 μm range suitable for osseointegration while maintaining compressive strengths of 50–300 MPa, whereas additive manufacturing enables the precise control of hierarchical architectures but requires careful post-processing to remove adhered powder, stabilize microstructures, and ensure corrosion and wear resistance. In addition, this review integrates fundamental aspects of bone biology and bone implant interaction to contextualize the functional requirements of porous Ti scaffolds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aditya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624ce4fa91c937236cdd3https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9120401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper