PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Blood1 citationsOpen Access

Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease assessment predicts progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
ZMZuha Majid

Key Points

  • Evaluate the prognostic impact of circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease assessment on progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on PFS outcomes stratified by EOT ctDNA MRD status.
  • Included studies with data on MRD-positive and MRD-negative PFS rates, hazard ratios, and risk ratios.
  • Used a random-effects model to pool PFS percentages and calculate risk ratios.
  • Meta-analysis included eight studies with 490 patients, showing MRD-positive patients have significantly inferior progression-free survival compared to MRD-negative patients.
  • The pooled risk ratio for PFS in MRD-positive vs. MRD-negative patients was RR = 0.27, indicating a 73% higher risk of progression for MRD-positive patients.
  • ctDNA MRD identified residual disease in PET-negative patients, showcasing its superior prognostic capability compared to imaging.

Abstract

Abstract Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Predicts Progression-Free Survival in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a sensitive approach to identify subclinical disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Compared to conventional imaging modalities like PET-CT, ctDNA MRD provides molecular-level insights into disease persistence. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic impact of ctDNA MRD status at the end of treatment (EOT) on progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified studies reporting PFS outcomes stratified by EOT ctDNA MRD status in DLBCL patients. Studies with data on MRD-positive and MRD-negative PFS rates, hazard ratios (HR), or risk ratios (RR) were included. PFS percentages were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk ratios comparing MRD-positive to MRD-negative groups were calculated. Comparative PET scan outcomes were qualitatively analyzed where available. Results A total of eight studies encompassing 490 patients were included in the meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic significance of ctDNA-based minimal residual disease (MRD) status at the end of treatment (EOT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The pooled analysis demonstrated that MRD-positive patients had a significantly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to MRD-negative patients. The forest plot analysis revealed a consistent association across studies, with MRD-positive status conferring a markedly increased risk of disease progression. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for PFS in MRD-positive versus MRD-negative patients was RR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.19-0.40; p 0.001, indicating a 73% higher risk of progression in patients with detectable ctDNA at EOT. All individual studies showed a consistent direction of effect favoring MRD-negative status, though the magnitude varied across cohorts. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 75%), likely reflecting differences in MRD detection techniques, follow-up durations, and population characteristics. Subgroup analyses revealed that ctDNA MRD identified residual disease in a subset of patients who were PET-negative, highlighting its superior prognostic sensitivity over imaging modalities. Conclusions End-of-treatment ctDNA MRD positivity is a strong predictor of inferior progression-free survival in DLBCL, outperforming PET-CT in detecting subclinical disease. Integration of ctDNA MRD assessment into post-treatment surveillance strategies could enable earlier identification of high-risk patients, guiding tailored therapeutic interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zuha Majid (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624d74fa91c937236d0d9https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Liquid biopsy at the finish line: End-of-treatment ctDNA predicts relapse and survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.2026
  2. 2Integration of longitudinal ctdna MRD and PET/CT enhances prognostic stratification in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A prospective multicenter study2025
  3. 3Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor DNA Measurable Residual Disease After First-Line Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma2025 · 11 citations
  4. 4Remission Assessment by Circulating Tumor DNA in Large B-Cell Lymphoma2025 · 32 citations
  5. 5ctDNA versus PET/CT at end of treatment in large B-cell lymphoma: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.2026