PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Blood0 citations

Facility-level disparities in outcomes of subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma: A national cancer database analysis

View Full Paper
LBLeyla BojaniniEKErin KaserDRDaniel Rosas

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of treatment facility type, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors on survival outcomes in patients with subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma.
  • Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database.
  • Compared patient demographics, clinical features, and survival outcomes between academic and community cancer programs.
  • Survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model.
  • Adjusted median overall survival was 16.67 years in academic cancer programs and 17.86 years in community cancer programs.
  • No significant differences in survival outcomes based on treatment facility type.
  • Higher private insurance rates found in academic cancer programs compared to community programs.

Abstract

Abstract Background Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is an exceptionally rare malignancy, representing less than 1% of all mature T-cell lymphomas. In the United States, it occurs most commonly in Caucasian and African American patients (J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 suppl 16; abstre19548). Due to its rarity, the impact of institutional setting and sociodemographic variables on clinical outcomes in SPTCL remains poorly characterized. This study aims to assess the influence of treatment facility type, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic indicators on treatment patterns and survival outcomes among patients with SPTCL in the United States, using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with SPTCL between 2004 and 2022 using data from the NCDB. Patient demographics, clinical features, socioeconomic indicators, time to treatment intervals, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were compared between academic cancer programs (ACPs) and community cancer programs (CCPs). ACPs included academic and research programs, including NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. CCPs comprised community, comprehensive community, and integrated network cancer programs. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Adjusted median survival times were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, ethnicity, insurance status, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, and Great Circle Distance to the treatment center.Results A total of 460 patients with SPTCL were included: 229 (50%) treated at ACPs and 93 (20%) at CCPs; facility type was not available for 138 patients (30%). The median age at diagnosis was lower among ACP patients (57 years) compared to CCP patients (60 years; p0.001). Patients treated at ACPs were more likely to live in metropolitan areas (82% vs. 71%, p0.001) and have higher income. Private insurance was more common among ACP patients (54%) than CCP patients (47%), while Medicare coverage was more frequent in CCPs (39% vs. 32%). The proportion of uninsured patients remained low and comparable between groups (2% in CCPs vs. 3% in ACPs). Treatment rates were similar across facility types (57% in ACPs vs. 55% in CCPs, p=0.78). The median time from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation was shorter for ACP patients (53 days) than for CCP patients (56 days, p=0.024). Radiation therapy was more frequently used in CCPs (19% vs. 11%). Survival analysis showed no significant differences between facility types. The adjusted median overall survival of 16.67 years in ACPs and 17.86 years in CCPs (p=0.799). Adjusted survival probabilities at ACPs were 78% at 2 years, 67% at 5 years, and 64% at 10 years and at CCPs were 72% at 2 years, 67% at 5 years and 63% at 10 years.ConclusionAmong patients with SPTCL documented in the NCDB, adjusted survival outcomes were favorable and comparable between academic and community cancer programs. Differences in patient characteristics such as younger age, private insurance, and metropolitan residence among those treated at ACPs highlight variations in access to care but did not translate into disparities in clinical outcomes. Future efforts should explore how care delivery models can reduce barriers and ensure timely, equitable management of this rare lymphoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bojanini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/693624dd4fa91c937236d1c0https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-8023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper