PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025ACM Journal on Responsible Computing0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating MiCA Framework via Industry Perceptions of Risks

View Full Paper
AMAbdulkhamid MukhamedovVAVanessa Peluccio de AzevedoMEMichel van Eeten

Key Points

  • To evaluate the MiCA framework by identifying stakeholder perceptions of financial and security risks.
  • Interviewed 20 representatives from crypto-asset service providers, issuers, institutional investors, and legal experts.
  • Compared risks perceived by stakeholders with those covered by the MiCA framework.
  • Identified that crypto-asset issuers face the least addressed risks in the MiCA framework.
  • Residual risks remain related to smart contracts and transactions.

Abstract

The growing economic value of blockchain-driven financial applications brings increasing risks. In recent years, EU regulators felt the urgent need to address the financial and security risks that digital currencies might pose if left unsupervised. In 2020, the European Commission proposed a draft regulation called Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA). It sets out the rules for the crypto-asset issuers and service providers located in the EU or serving EU clients. To date, there is no evaluation of the risks covered by the proposed regulations besides the Commission’s own evaluation. We conducted a study to identify the risk perceptions of different stakeholder groups in the market by interviewing 20 representatives of Crypto-Asset Service Providers, Crypto-Asset Issuers, Institutional Investors, and Legal Experts. We then compared the risks deemed relevant by the stakeholder groups with the risks covered in the MiCA framework. That allowed us to identify which risks and stakeholder groups’ concerns are insufficiently covered by the current version of the MiCA framework. As a result, we show that Crypto-Asset Issuers’ risks are the least addressed in the current MiCA version. Specifically, residual risks remain with regard to smart contracts, oracles, and transactions. These risks should be considered for upcoming amendments to the regulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukhamedov et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694019032d562116f28f6232https://doi.org/10.1145/3785002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper