PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2025The American Journal of Surgical Pathology3 citations

Uterine Sarcomas Harbouring Novel FOXO1 Gene Rearrangements

View Full Paper
TPT. R. E. PilkingtonMedical ProtectiveCWC. WattGenomics EnglandJDJosephine K. DermawanCleveland Clinic

Key Points

  • All cases exhibited unique gene rearrangements, with similarities to known oncogenic events.
  • Seven distinct tumor types were examined, reinforcing the complexity of uterine sarcomas harboring foxo1 changes.
  • Analysis of structural variances in foxo1 points to possible driver mutations linked to tumor genesis.
  • Determining the exact role of foxo1 rearrangements may improve classification of uterine neoplasms.

Abstract

Increasing availability and utilisation of high-throughput sequencing techniques has resulted in a rapidly expanding range of uterine mesenchymal lesions harbouring recurrent and nonrecurrent gene rearrangements. Within the literature, 3 molecularly confirmed FOXO1 -rearranged uterine corpus tumors have been reported, all representing alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS). We report 5 cases of non-ARMS uterine mesenchymal tumors, in patients aged 36 to 71, harbouring novel FOXO1 rearrangements with different fusion partners ( JRK , PIK3R4, MEIS1 , and ATP7B); in the fifth case, FISH revealed a FOXO1 gene rearrangement with an unknown fusion partner. Although morphologically heterogenous, all 5 cases had a low-grade spindle cell component with 3 cases showing prominent myxoid stroma. Two cases were originally diagnosed as myxoid leiomyosarcoma, one as high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, one as an undifferentiated sarcoma with a fibrosarcoma-like appearance, and the other as a myxoid neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential. In 3 cases, the rearrangements showed similar breakpoints to known recurrent FOXO1 gene fusions; 2 rearrangements ( JRK::FOXO1 and MEIS1::FOXO1 ) incorporate both an intact transactivation domain and a DNA-binding domain akin to the rearrangements seen in ARMS, likely representing true oncogenic driver events. Although all 5 cases were confined to the uterine corpus at presentation, recurrences occurred in 2 patients indicating a potential for malignant behaviour and justifying the designation of sarcoma. These cases expand the landscape of FOXO1 -rearranged neoplasms and describe a potential new uterine mesenchymal entity. Further study of additional cases is needed to establish whether these rearrangements truly represent an initiating event for a distinct subset of uterine sarcomas, or whether FOXO1 rearrangements simply represent an additional noninitiating/nondriver event within other established tumor types.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pilkington et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b372d562116f28f7e9ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000002494
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper