PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2025Energies6 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Balancing Price Forecasting in the Context of Renewable-Rich Power Systems, Highlighting Profit-Aware and Spike-Resilient Approaches

View Full Paper
ADAli Dinler

Key Points

  • This review identifies gaps in price forecasting for renewable-rich power systems and evaluates existing methodologies.
  • Systematic categorization of literature across prediction horizons and modeling paradigms.
  • Evaluation of auxiliary features in price forecasts and their impact on forecasting error.
  • Identification of performance benchmarks and emerging methodologies.
  • Reduction of errors in price forecasting using auxiliary features like day-ahead prices and meteorological inputs.
  • Typical mean absolute percentage errors range from 3-10% for short-term forecasting to approximately 25% for longer horizons.
  • Research gaps identified include inadequate modeling of price spikes and limited innovation in processing techniques.

Abstract

Balancing (real-time) market price forecasting is a vital enabler for renewable integration, storage arbitrage, and risk-aware trading, yet the literature remains fragmented and underdeveloped. This review addresses these shortcomings by systematically categorizing and evaluating studies across prediction horizons, modeling paradigms, and data-engineering practices. We show that enriching forecasts with auxiliary features, such as day-ahead prices, net imbalance volumes, renewable forecast errors, and meteorological inputs, substantially reduces error relative to price-only baselines. Probabilistic frameworks, while invaluable for providing risk envelopes in bidding strategies, are still underexploited. Typical reported accuracy spans mean absolute percentage errors of approximately 3–10% for very short-term (1–6 h ahead) horizons, 10–20% for mid-term horizons (12–24 h ahead), and around 25% for longer horizons (24–36 h ahead), with spikes and rapid ramps driving most residual error. From this synthesis, we identify the following four critical research gaps: (1) inadequate modeling of price spikes and ramps, (2) limited innovation in pre- and post-processing techniques, (3) sparse adoption of profit-driven (revenue-aware) evaluation, and (4) weak segmentation of distinct temporal regimes. By mapping prevailing methodologies, benchmarking performance, and highlighting emerging paradigms, such as feedback-driven, risk-aware, feature-enriched pipelines, this review delineates the state of the art and proposes a research agenda focused on maximizing economic value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali Dinler (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b3d2d562116f28f8298https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper