PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2025Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract B029: Clinical and Sociodemographic Associations Between Early-Onset and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in a U.S.–Mexico Border Population

View Full Paper
ARAtharva RailkarTexas Tech UniversityAHAmir HernandezTexas Tech UniversityJMJennifer MolokwuTexas Tech University

Key Points

  • To investigate the clinical and sociodemographic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer in a U.S.–Mexico border population.
  • Conducted a secondary analysis of data from a case-control study (2011-2023)
  • Sample included 818 adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer
  • Compared early-onset (before 50) and late-onset (at or after 50) CRC regarding health status and comorbidities
  • Early-onset patients showed higher rates of being uninsured and higher incomes
  • Late-onset patients had greater comorbidity burden with conditions like heart failure and diabetes
  • Biomarkers indicated early-onset patients had healthier liver function while late-onset patients had higher renal markers

Abstract

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality for both men and women in the United States. While the general incidence of CRC among older adults has decreased since the 1990s, CRC incidence in younger adults has increased during the same time span. Surveillance data specifically reveal a hotspot of CRC incidence along the U. S. -Mexico border near El Paso, Texas, with an upward trend even as statewide rates have plateaued. Despite these observed disparities, there is limited data on early-onset CRC patterns in border communities. This study is a secondary analysis of data derived from a case-control study conducted between 2011 and 2023 to describe the health status of an outpatient population in El Paso, Texas. The sample population (n = 818) was identified from patients in the parent study who were cases and had a CRC diagnosis. This study investigated differences in the health status, comorbidities, and biomarkers in individuals diagnosed with CRC before age 50 (early-onset, EO-CRC) and those diagnosed at or after age 50 (late-onset, LO-CRC) in a predominantly Hispanic population along the U. S. -Mexico border. Results indicated that EO-CRC patients had higher rates of being uninsured (22. 6%), having private insurance (54. 1%), and reporting higher household incomes (p = 0. 047). They were also more likely to have metastatic cancer (OR: 0. 650; 95% CI: 0. 457, 0. 925; p = 0. 016) and to have a family history of cancer (OR: 0. 276; 95% CI: 0. 117, 0. 652; p = 0. 002). In contrast, LO-CRC patients exhibited greater comorbidity burden, including significantly higher prevalence of heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and type II diabetes. LO-CRC patients were also more likely to have been prescribed medications such as aspirin (OR: 5. 472; 95% CI: 2. 819, 10. 618; p 0. 001) and statins (OR: 3. 470; 95% CI: 2. 092, 5. 758; p 0. 001). Biomarker analysis revealed that EO-CRC patients had higher aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, high-density lipoprotein, and alkaline phosphatase levels compared to LO-CRC patients, while LO-CRC patients had higher blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, and potassium levels. These findings underscore meaningful clinical and demographic distinctions between EO-CRC and LO-CRC that may reflect unique etiologic pathways, access challenges, and behavioral factors. Younger CRC patients tended to have lower Elixhauser risk scores and fewer comorbidities, which aligns with previous studies suggesting that EO-CRC patients may otherwise be relatively healthy at diagnosis. The higher metastatic burden among younger patients adds urgency to improving symptom recognition in younger adults. It suggests that existing screening and diagnostic models may miss warning signs in younger populations. As EO-CRC incidence increases, particularly among Hispanic populations, targeted, age-sensitive approaches to prevention, diagnosis, and care are essential for improving outcomes and reducing disparities. Citation Format: Atharva Railkar, Amir Hernandez, Jennifer Molokwu. Clinical and Sociodemographic Associations Between Early-Onset and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in a U. S. –Mexico Border Population abstract. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31 (23Suppl): Abstract nr B029.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Railkar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d472d562116f28f8628https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.earlyonsetca25-b029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract B020: Early-onset colorectal cancer mortality trends and birth cohort effect in Mexico, 1998-20232025
  2. 2Abstract B166: Impact of rurality on early-onset colorectal cancer outcomes: Age, geographic disparities, and the need for improved access and awareness in the United States2024
  3. 3Trends in early-onset colorectal cancer: A 20-year epidemiological study at a referral center in northeastern Mexico.2026
  4. 4Abstract PR002: Clinical, pathological, and molecular differences in early- and late-onset colorectal cancer: Results from a multicenter study2025
  5. 5Abstract 1011: A comprehensive comparative analysis of African Americans’ early onset and late onset colorectal cancer: A 60 year study in underserved population serving hospital2024