PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2025Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy6 citationsOpen Access

Urate-lowering therapy and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperuricemia

View Full Paper
SNSheng NieSZShi-Yu ZhouRCRuixuan Chen

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of urate-lowering therapy on kidney outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients with hyperuricemia.
  • Cohort study design using sequential target trial emulation framework
  • Included 269,831 eligible person trials from the China Renal Data System
  • Compared outcomes between patients receiving urate-lowering therapy and supportive care alone
  • 3-year cumulative incidence of composite kidney outcomes was 19.69% in the ULT group versus 23.22% in control
  • Risk difference favoring ULT was −3.53%
  • ULT associated with significantly lower risks of end-stage kidney disease, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality

Abstract

Abstract Hyperuricemia is considered a modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). There remains controversy over the effects of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on kidney outcomes in patients with CKD and hyperuricemia. We conducted a cohort study using a sequential target trial emulation framework to evaluate the composite kidney outcomes in patients with CKD and hyperuricemia initiating ULT versus supportive care alone (control). A total of 269,831 eligible person trials (56,936 unique persons) with CKD and hyperuricemia who had received supportive care were included from the China Renal Data System database. The primary outcome was a composite kidney outcome defined as a greater than 40% decline in the estimated GFR or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The 3-year cumulative incidence rates of the composite kidney outcomes were 19.69% and 23.22% in the ULT group and the control group, respectively, with a risk difference of −3.53% (95% CI, −5.25% to −1.94%). The estimated 3-year risk differences for ESKD, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality were −1.88% (−3.28% to −0.45%), −2.25% (−3.02% to −1.51%), and −0.69% (−1.33% to −0.05%), respectively, all of which favor the ULT group. The estimates from the subgroup and sensitivity analyses were consistent with those from the primary analysis. Thus, ULT is associated with a significantly lower risk of kidney disease progression and mortality in patients with stage 3 or higher CKD and hyperuricemia. Large randomized clinical trials with refined designs are needed to assess the effect of ULT in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nie et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d542d562116f28f8a53https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-025-02497-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TrialEmulation: An R Package to Emulate Target Trials for Causal Analysis of Observational Time-to-event Data2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Associations of uric acid with the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease: the Kailuan Study2024 · 22 citations
  3. 3Contemporary Prevalence of Gout and Hyperuricemia in the United States and Decadal Trends: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–20162019 · 1,122 citations
  4. 4Longitudinal Progression Trajectory of GFR Among Patients With CKD2012 · 325 citations
  5. 5Conversion of Urine Protein–Creatinine Ratio or Urine Dipstick Protein to Urine Albumin–Creatinine Ratio for Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Screening and Prognosis2020 · 347 citations