PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Vehicles2 citationsOpen Access

Investigation on the Manufacturing, Testing, and Simulation Processes of the Hood Hinge Assembly

View Full Paper
ŞTŞtefan TabacuUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica BucureștiGCGabriel CimpeanuOsservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle d'Aosta

Key Points

  • Manufacturing processes significantly enhance product quality, boosting efficiency and reliability across the automotive industry.
  • A notable 1.6% difference is observed when comparing experimental results with numerical models for automotive components.
  • Assessment involves numerical modeling and dimensional analysis using LS-DYNA simulations and non-contact scanning techniques.
  • The integration of digital transformation suggests a paradigm shift, indicating potential gains in automotive production timelines.

Abstract

The automotive industry is currently undergoing significant transformations driven by challenges such as fierce competition, supply chain disruptions, and stringent legislative regulations aimed at reducing pollutant emissions. The research employs a combination of theoretical analysis and numerical modeling to investigate the manufacturing processes of stamped automotive components. Data collection methods include experimental testing of materials, LS-DYNA simulations, and non-contact scanning for dimensional analysis. The study also utilizes a workflow diagram to illustrate the various phases involved in the design and validation of automotive assemblies. The findings detail the critical role of digital transformation in the automotive industry, particularly in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of manufacturing processes. Implementing digital twins improves product quality and reduces product development time. The experimental results were compared with simulation data, and a good correlation was identified, showing, for the numerical model with complete history (thickness and stress), a difference of 1.6%. Furthermore, to simplify the process of developing the numerical models for the initial iterations, a scale factor of ~1.1 is proposed for the testing load. This factor is not limited to the current design, as the manufacturing stages are similar for this range of products.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tabacu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401f142d562116f28fa3b2https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles7040157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Relationship Between Financial Development, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Environmental Degradation: A Comparison of G7 and E7 Countries2025 · 11 citations
  2. 2Indentation measurement of thin plates using 3D digital image correlation and experimental validation2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3A review on the applications of artificial neural network techniques for accelerating finite element analysis in the civil engineering domain2025 · 31 citations
  4. 4Numerical investigations of 3D printed structures under compressive loads using damage and fracture criterion: Experiments, parameter identification, and validation2020 · 41 citations
  5. 5Extension of the GISSMO fracture model for thin-walled structures under combined tensile and bending loads2024 · 6 citations