PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2025Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology0 citations

Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Glycemic Profiles and Correlates in Young Adults Ages 18 to 26 Years

View Full Paper
NANicholas N. ArceMVMy H VuBBBraden Barnett

Key Points

  • Males exhibited higher mean sensor glucose levels compared to females, highlighting sex differences in glycemic regulation.
  • A total of 105 young adults provided continuous glucose monitoring data, with significant correlations found with body mass index and physical activity.
  • Continuous glucose monitoring was used to derive glycemic profiles, showing variability linked to biological factors such as age and sex.
  • These findings emphasize the need for tailored reference ranges for young adults based on continuous glucose monitoring metrics.

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly applied in populations without diabetes, yet existing reference ranges are largely derived from middle-aged or older adults. This study characterized CGM metrics in young adults without diabetes and examined variation by sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity (PA). Method: Participants wore an unmasked Dexcom G7 CGM for up to 10 days under free-living conditions. Glycemic metrics were derived using the iglu R package and summarized as median IQR. Associations with sex, age, BMI, and PA were evaluated using Wilcoxon tests, Spearman correlations, and quantile regressions. Results: A total of 105 participants (age = 21 years range: 18-26, BMI 23 kg/m 2 21-25; 72% female; 73% non-White) provided ≥48hr of CGM data. Compared with females, males had higher mean sensor glucose (110 103-119 vs 104 99-108 mg/dL; P 140 mg/dL (1.61.0-2.6 vs 1.30.7-2.0; P = .02). Age correlated with CV ( r = .20, P = .04). BMI was inversely correlated with CV ( r = −.35), MAGE ( r = −.35), and MODD ( r = −.27), all P < .001. Physical activity was modestly associated with reduced glycemic burden. Conclusion: CGM revealed sex differences in young adults–males exhibited higher mean glucose and excursions–while both sexes maintained normoglycemic patterns. Age, BMI, and PA were linked to variability indices. Findings provide CGM reference data for young adults and highlight the importance of biological and behavioral factors in glycemic regulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arce et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694020ee2d562116f28fb121https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251398876
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper