Accurate shoreline determination is essential for the study of coastal and inland water processes, hydrography, and the monitoring of aquatic and terrestrial environments. This study compares two modern remote sensing technologies: MLS conducted with a USV and photogrammetry using a UAV. The research was carried out on Lake Kłodno, characterised by a complex shoreline with vegetation and hydrotechnical structures. Both approaches satisfied the accuracy requirements of the IHO Special Order for shoreline extraction (≤5 m at the 95% confidence level). For the UAV-derived orthophoto, the error within which 95% of shoreline points were located (corresponding to 2.45·σ) was 0.05 m for the natural shoreline and 0.06 m for the variant including piers, both well below the IHO threshold. MLS achieved a 95% error of 1.16 m, which also complies with the Special Order criteria. UAV data enable clear interpretation of the land–water boundary, whereas MLS provides complete three-dimensional spatial information, independent of lighting conditions, and allows surveys of vegetated or inaccessible areas. The results demonstrate the complementarity of the two approaches: UAV is well suited to highly accurate shoreline mapping and the identification of hydrotechnical structures, while MLS is valuable for analysing the nearshore zone and for surveying vegetated or inaccessible areas. The findings confirm the value of integrating these approaches and highlight the need to extend research to other types of waterbodies, to consider seasonal variability, and to develop methods for the automatic extraction of shorelines.
Oktawia Specht (2025) studied this question.