PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 2, 2025Indian Journal of Science and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Traditional and Calibration-based Estimation of the Population Mean for Stratified Random Sampling under Non-Response

View Full Paper
APAnant Patel

Key Points

  • Enhanced population mean estimations reported, indicating substantial improvements in accuracy with new methods.
  • Percentage relative efficiencies of proposed estimators reach up to 324.5%, surpassing existing estimation techniques.
  • Simulation study employed using R software, focusing on traditional and calibration estimation methods.
  • Findings highlight potential benefits of calibrated estimators in addressing response bias in data.

Abstract

Objectives: To propose estimators for the population mean considering the non-response presented in the data, utilizing an auxiliary variable with the help of both traditional and calibration estimation methods. Methods: To investigate how the suggested calibration estimators perform in the case of non-response, a simulation study has been conducted using the R software. Findings: As per the percentage relative efficiencies (%PRE) using Population- I and II, the suggested estimators outperformed the existing estimators considered here, The percentage relative efficiencies (%PRE) of the proposed estimators 𝑦𝑇̄ 𝑆𝑇,𝑦𝑇̄ π‘Œ ,𝑦𝐢̄ π‘†π‘‡π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘π‘¦πΆΜ„ π‘Œ vary from 200.513% to 215.641%, 200.524% to 215.654%, 217.910% to 247.667% and 217.904% to 247.662%, respectively, while 158.931% to 164.414% for the existing estimator 𝑦𝐿̄ 𝑒𝑒 with respect to the estimator 𝑦𝐻̄ 𝐻, as shown in Table 4 for Population I. Similarly, the percentage relative efficiencies (%PRE) of the estimators with respect to 𝑦𝐻̄ 𝐻 those depicted in Table 4 vary from 144.9% to 148.3%, 237.2% to 264.7 %, 237.3 % to 264.7 %, 279.6% to 324.5% and 279.6% to 324.5% for the existing estimator 𝑦𝐿̄ 𝑒𝑒, and the suggested estimators 𝑦𝑇̄ 𝑆𝑇,𝑦𝑇̄ π‘Œ ,𝑦𝐢̄ π‘†π‘‡π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘π‘¦πΆΜ„ π‘Œ , respectively, for Population II. Novelty: The proposed method has efficiently improved the traditional existing estimator’s precision in estimation. Using this method, we can derive more new calibrated estimators. Keywords: Calibration approach; Stratified random sampling; Chi-square type distance function; Non-response

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anant Patel (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6940273f2d562116f28ff525https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v18i42.1366
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improved calibration estimation of population mean in stratified sampling using two auxiliary variables2024 Β· 3 citations
  2. 2Treating the problem of non-response in stratified random sampling under calibration approach2024 Β· 5 citations
  3. 3Theoretical Modeling by Addressing Nonresponse Complications to Improve the Population Mean Under Stratified Random Sampling: Application and Analysis2026
  4. 4Estimation of Population Mean in Domains of Study Under Double Sampling: A Calibration Technique for Subsampling the Nonrespondents2025 Β· 1 citations
  5. 5A generalized two-step calibrated ratio estimators of population mean in stratified random sampling2026