PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2025Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of outcomes associated with antipseudomonal beta-lactams for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort analysis

View Full Paper
MFMargaret FieldingKDKathryn DeSearVKVidhu Kariyawasam

Key Points

  • No significant differences in mortality or bacteremia recurrence were found between treatment groups.
  • The analysis included 100 patients with 50 patients receiving standard care and 50 on antipseudomonal beta-lactams.
  • Retrospective cohort study compared patient outcomes for bacteremia treated with cefazolin, oxacillin, and others.
  • Results highlight the need for larger studies to confirm the efficacy of new treatments.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia with antipseudomonal beta-lactams (APBLs) is a common clinical practice in confirmed or suspected polymicrobial infections. Limited data exist to evaluate the impact of APBL treatment on outcomes in MSSA bacteremia. Objectives: To determine whether differences in outcomes exist between patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with cefazolin/oxacillin (standard of care; SOC) versus APBLs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Adult and pediatric patients hospitalized between June 2016 and June 2023 with at least one positive blood culture for MSSA who received at least 14 consecutive days of inpatient therapy with cefazolin, oxacillin, cefepime, piperacillin–tazobactam, or meropenem were included. Patients who received APBLs were compared to those who received SOC. The primary outcome was composite clinical failure (i.e., 30-day all-cause mortality and/or bacteremia recurrence within 30 days). Secondary outcomes included 60-day all-cause mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission, time to bacteremia clearance, time to mortality, and adverse events (i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection, hepatotoxicity, and acute kidney injury). Results: One hundred patients were included, with 50 patients in each group. The most common source of bacteremia was catheter-related (28% total), and twice as many patients met criteria for complicated MSSA bacteremia in the SOC versus APBL group (80% vs 40%, p < 0.0001). Three patients (6%) in the APBL group met the composite primary outcome compared to 1 (2%) in the SOC group ( p = 0.62). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: No differences in mortality or bacteremia recurrence were identified among patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with APBLs compared to SOC. Larger studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fielding et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69402a7e2d562116f290230dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251395527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper