PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2025Advanced Materials6 citations

Gradient‐Acceptor‐Doping Breaks the Piezoelectric Trade‐Off in Lead‐Free (K, Na)NbO 3 Ceramics

View Full Paper
YLYan LeiYYYang YaoZWZhipeng Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to overcome the trade-off between high piezoelectric coefficient and mechanical quality factor in ceramics.
  • Developed a gradient-acceptor-doping strategy using Cu2+ ions.
  • Applied the method to (K, Na)NbO3 ceramics.
  • Conducted multi-scale structural analysis to evaluate properties.
  • Achieved a d33 of 350 pC/N and a Qm of 340.
  • Demonstrated a fourfold improvement in Qm with only a 10% reduction in d33.
  • Showed that gradient doping retains a soft interior while hardening the surface to enhance Qm.

Abstract

Abstract Achieving a high piezoelectric coefficient ( d 33 ) and a high mechanical quality factor ( Q m ) simultaneously in ferroelectric ceramics has been a persistent challenge, as conventional doping strategies, i.e., donor doping and acceptor doping, inevitably sacrifice one for the other. Here, the inherent trade‐off is breaking through a new gradient‐acceptor‐doping strategy. By judiciously introducing gradient Cu 2+ ‐acceptor ions in “soft” (K, Na)NbO 3 (KNN) ceramics, a record combination of properties is achieved — a d 33 of 350 pC/N and a Q m of 340,—the first co‐elevation of both parameters exceeding 300 in KNN‐based systems. This represents a fourfold improvement in Q m with only a 10% reduction in d 33 . Multi‐scale structural analysis reveals that the gradient doping retains a “soft” interior for high d 33 , and creates a “hardened” surface layer that effectively restrains domain switching, accounting for the enhanced Q m . This work offers a new paradigm for designing high‐power ferroelectric ceramics by spatially tailoring functional properties.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lei et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6941aae10f5af7fd17df5968https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202521306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Local variations in defect polarization and covalent bonding in ferroelectric Cu2+-doped PZT and KNN functional ceramics at the morphotropic phase boundary2009 · 73 citations
  2. 2High piezoelectricity in low-temperature sintering potassium–sodium niobate-based lead-free ceramics2014 · 25 citations
  3. 3Lead‐Free Relaxor Ferroelectrics2011 · 1,006 citations
  4. 4(K,Na)NbO 3 ‐Based Ceramics for Piezoelectric “Hard”Lead‐Free Materials2010 · 66 citations
  5. 5Projector augmented-wave method1994 · 92,976 citations