PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 11, 2025International Studies Quarterly1 citations

Theorizing Norm Stagnation and the Evolution of Domestic Norm Compliance

View Full Paper
TGTyler GirardNMNicole McMahon

Key Points

  • Norm compliance diminishes as global standards evolve, leading to stagnation at the domestic level.
  • A knowledge gap contributes to disjointed adoption of norms within countries, particularly in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity.
  • This approach analyzes the interplay between evolving norms and their acceptance in domestic contexts.
  • The findings may enable more effective strategies for addressing resistance to international norms in diverse settings.

Abstract

Abstract Research on international norms is increasingly motivated by their nonlinear evolution and processes of contestation and regression. We advance this work by considering how simultaneous but distinct evolutionary shifts can create diachronic gaps between global norms and national compliance. This sequence of events in which a country that demonstrably embraces a global norm fails to keep pace as the substance of the norm evolves over time is inconsistent with recent work on international norm adaptation, resistance, and backlash. We instead theorize how the degree of norm compliance in a country can diminish over time as the broader norm evolves, a process we term “norm stagnation.” We also identify two potential sources of norm stagnation: a knowledge gap and domestic gridlock. Drawing on examples from research on the sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression (SOGIE) norm, we illustrate how both knowledge gaps and domestic gridlock can contribute to the domestic adoption of a norm becoming disjointed from the global norm as the global norm shifts over time. This theory note thus contributes to research on the dynamism of and backlash against international norms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Girard et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6941adf50f5af7fd17df6016https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf086
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1When “Old” Constructivism Was New: Reflections on Classical Constructivism2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Rogue States as Norm Entrepreneurs2019 · 53 citations
  3. 3Moral Movements and Foreign Policy2010 · 177 citations
  4. 4Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines1998 · 1,117 citations
  5. 5Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness2018 · 252 citations