PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2004Journal of Medical Internet Research6,636 citationsOpen Access

Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

View Full Paper
GEGünther Eysenbach

Key Points

  • This work presents a checklist to improve the quality of reporting in web-based surveys.
  • Developed the CHERRIES checklist to guide authors in reporting web surveys.
  • Emphasizes the importance of clear descriptions of sample selection and methodology.
  • Aims to facilitate better understanding of potential biases in self-selected samples.
  • Reports made under the CHERRIES guidelines will enhance report usefulness and reader understanding of sample differences.
  • Author adherence to the checklist is expected to improve overall report quality in internet research.

Abstract

Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a "representative" sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Günther Eysenbach (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6943904d032e178748a28f7ahttps://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper