PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2024ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology2,749 citations

A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models

View Full Paper
YCYupeng ChangJilin UniversityXWXu WangHohai UniversityJWJindong WangPennsylvania State University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry, owing to their unprecedented performance in various applications. As LLMs continue to play a vital role in both research and daily use, their evaluation becomes increasingly critical, not only at the task level, but also at the society level for better understanding of their potential risks. Over the past years, significant efforts have been made to examine LLMs from various perspectives. This paper presents a comprehensive review of these evaluation methods for LLMs, focusing on three key dimensions: what to evaluate , where to evaluate , and how to evaluate . Firstly, we provide an overview from the perspective of evaluation tasks, encompassing general natural language processing tasks, reasoning, medical usage, ethics, education, natural and social sciences, agent applications, and other areas. Secondly, we answer the ‘where’ and ‘how’ questions by diving into the evaluation methods and benchmarks, which serve as crucial components in assessing the performance of LLMs. Then, we summarize the success and failure cases of LLMs in different tasks. Finally, we shed light on several future challenges that lie ahead in LLMs evaluation. Our aim is to offer invaluable insights to researchers in the realm of LLMs evaluation, thereby aiding the development of more proficient LLMs. Our key point is that evaluation should be treated as an essential discipline to better assist the development of LLMs. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at: https://github.com/MLGroupJLU/LLM-eval-survey

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6960101e3b8cf27ae653fae5https://doi.org/10.1145/3641289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Class-based n -gram models of natural language1992 · 2,894 citations
  2. 2Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluators2023 · 17 citations
  3. 3GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding2018 · 4,063 citations
  4. 4Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation2009 · 1,484 citations
  5. 5Personality Traits in Large Language Models2023 · 25 citations