PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2026Annals of Medicine and Surgery1 citationsOpen Access

Effectiveness of thiazide diuretics in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
TATaimoor AshrafFCFNU ChandniIsra UniversityFNFnu NancyKarachi Medical and Dental College

Key Result

HCTZ and CTD have comparable cardiovascular efficacy, but HCTZ is safer with lower rates of hypokalemia and hyponatremia compared to CTD.

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone in treating hypertension.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases.
  • Included randomized controlled trials and observational double-arm studies.
  • Analyzed cardiovascular outcomes using hazard ratios and confidence intervals.
  • Employed random effects model for statistical analysis.
  • No significant differences in cardiovascular outcomes between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone.
  • Patients on chlorthalidone had higher rates of hypokalemia and hyponatremia.
  • No significant difference in acute kidney injury risk between the two groups.

Structured PICO

Does hydrochlorothiazide reduce cardiovascular events or improve safety compared to chlorthalidone in patients with hypertension?

P
Population
Patients with hypertension (pooled from 6 randomized controlled trials or observational double-arm studies)
I
Intervention
Hydrochlorothiazide
C
Comparator
Chlorthalidone
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular outcomes (including major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and angina)hard clinical

Hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone provide comparable cardiovascular protection in patients with hypertension, but hydrochlorothiazide is associated with a lower risk of electrolyte imbalances.

Abstract

Background Thiazide diuretics are commonly prescribed for the treatment of hypertension (HTN). However, the comparative efficacy and safety of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus chlorthalidone (CTD) in managing patients with HTN remain unclear. Materials and Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed using two electronic databases, MEDLINE and Cochrane, from their inception through November 2024. The aim was to identify randomized controlled trials or observational double-arm studies assessing the effects of HCTZ versus CTD on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with HTN. Outcomes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and analyses were conducted using a random effects model. A P -value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 409 articles identified in the initial search, six relevant studies were included in the final analysis. No significant differences were observed between the HCTZ and CTD arms for cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and angina. However, patients receiving CTD experienced significantly higher rates of hypokalemia and hyponatremia compared to those on HCTZ. The risk of acute kidney injury did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion HCTZ and CTD showed comparable efficacy in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. Nevertheless, HCTZ appeared to have a safer profile, with a lower incidence of electrolyte imbalances, such as hypokalemia and hyponatremia, compared to CTD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ashraf et al. (2026) studied this question. HCTZ and CTD have comparable cardiovascular efficacy, but HCTZ is safer with lower rates of hypokalemia and hyponatremia compared to CTD.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696321d091e05aa366cb8132https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000004668
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper