PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Efficacy and toxicity outcomes of total neoadjuvant FLOT versus perioperative FLOT in resectable gastric cancer: Results from the Turkish Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer Working Group.

View Full Paper
CKCevat İlteriş KıkılıMDMert DurukanESErdem Sünger

Key Points

  • To compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of total neoadjuvant FLOT versus perioperative FLOT in resectable gastric cancer.
  • Included newly diagnosed resectable gastric cancer patients from 18 centers across Turkey.
  • Compared clinical and epidemiological characteristics using statistical methods.
  • Performed survival analyses using Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test.
  • 39 patients (21.3%) in the TNT group experienced all-grade toxicity versus 212 patients (57.3%) in the Per-FLOT group (p < 0.001).
  • Anemia prevalence was higher in the TNT group (72% vs 40%, p < 0.001).
  • No significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.77) or progression-free survival (p = 0.22) was found.

Abstract

414 Background: In resectable gastric cancer, most patients are unable to complete the perioperative FLOT regimen (Per-FLOT; 4 cycles of FLOT → surgery → 4 cycles of FLOT) due to treatment intolerance. Consequently, some centers prefer total neoadjuvant FLOT therapy (TNT; 8 cycles of FLOT → surgery). In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of these two regimens. Methods: Our study included newly diagnosed resectable gastric cancer patients from 18 centers across Turkey between 2018 and 2025. Patients were compared according to their clinical and epidemiological characteristics using appropriate statistical methods, and survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Results: A total of 370 patients were included in the Per-FLOT group and 183 in the TNT group. All-grade toxicity was observed in 39 patients (21.3%) in the TNT group and 212 patients (57.3%) in the Per-FLOT group (p < 0.001, OR 5.11, 95% CI 3.38–7.72). In multivariate analyses, treatment type (TNT vs Per-FLOT) remained significantly associated with toxicity (p < 0.001) alongside hemoglobin and albumin levels. Anemia (72% vs 40%, p < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (32% vs 18%, p < 0.001), neutropenia (43% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and elevated liver function tests (33% vs 11%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in the TNT group, whereas nausea (15% vs 35%, p < 0.001), Loss of appetite (13% vs 38%, p < 0.001), fatigue (15% vs 43%, p < 0.001), diarrhea (2% vs 11%, p < 0.001), neuropathy (9% vs 16%, p = 0.054), and myalgia (3% vs 10%, p = 0.004) were more common in the Per-FLOT group. Survival analyses revealed no significant difference in OS (p = 0.77) or PFS (p = 0.22). In the TNT group, 23% of patients achieved a complete pathological response, 48.5% a partial response, and 28.5% a minimal response. In the Per-FLOT group, the rates of complete, partial, and minimal pathological responses were 15.8%, 56.5%, and 27.7%, respectively (p = 0.09). Treatment completion rates were significantly higher in the TNT group (97.3%) compared with the Per-FLOT group (82.2%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: TNT FLOT showed similar efficacy but was associated with significantly higher treatment completion and a more favorable overall toxicity profile compared with perioperative FLOT. These findings support TNT FLOT as a promising alternative strategy in resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kıkılı et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e6f513bf7a6f02bff044https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.414
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper