PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Plants0 citationsOpen Access

Research on Water and Fertilizer Use Strategies for Silage Corn Under Different Irrigation Methods to Mitigate Abiotic Stress

View Full Paper
DTDelong TianCYChen YongBXBing Xu

Key Points

  • To optimize irrigation and fertilization regimes for silage maize under different hydrological scenarios.
  • Utilized the AquaCrop model validated by field experiments (2023-2024) and a 35-year meteorological dataset.
  • Assessed impacts of water-fertilizer-heat stress under different irrigation methods: DIM and SBDI.
  • Measured model performance based on soil moisture, canopy cover, and aboveground biomass.
  • Identified medium fertilizer rate (555 kg·ha−1) as optimal to mitigate abiotic stress.
  • DIM yielded maximum biomass (70.4 t·ha−1) in wet years; SBDI was more stable in normal and dry years.
  • Established a framework for decision-making in irrigation management for sustainable farming.

Abstract

To reconcile the intensifying trade-off between chronic water scarcity and escalating forage demand in the Yellow River Basin, this study optimized integrated irrigation and fertilization regimes for silage maize. Leveraging the AquaCrop model, validated by 2023–2024 field experiments and a 35-year (1990–2024) meteorological dataset, we systematically quantified the impacts of multi-factorial water–fertilizer–heat stress under drip irrigation with mulch (DIM) and shallow-buried drip irrigation (SBDI). Model performance was robust, yielding high simulation accuracy for soil moisture (RMSE 0.7 and R2 ≥ 0.85. Results revealed distinct stress dynamics across hydrological scenarios: mild temperature stress predominated in wet years, whereas severe water and fertilizer stresses emerged as the primary constraints during dry years. To mitigate these stresses, a medium fertilizer rate (555 kg·ha−1) was identified as the stable optimum, while dynamic irrigation requirements were determined as 90, 135, and 180 mm for wet, normal, and dry years, respectively. Comparative evaluation indicated that DIM achieved maximum productivity in wet years (aboveground biomass yield 70.4 t·ha−1), whereas SBDI exhibited superior “stable yield–water saving” performance in normal and dry years. The established “hydrological year–irrigation method–threshold” framework provides a robust decision-making tool for precision management, offering critical scientific support for the sustainable, high-quality development of livestock farming in arid regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e71813bf7a6f02bff72dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants15020228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper