PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-2138. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Neurological Dysfunction in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Cefepime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam

View Full Paper
DSDaniel ScozzariMDMichael DeWittCBChristopher Buckley

Key Points

  • Determine risk factors for neurological dysfunction in patients treated with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam.
  • Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of hospitalized patients
  • Inpatients receiving cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam for ≥ 2 days included
  • Data collected on patient characteristics and antibiotic choice
  • 2,642 patients analyzed, accounting for exclusions
  • 31 patients developed neurological dysfunction (1.2%)
  • Cefepime use associated with higher rate of neurological dysfunction (OR 2.24, p=0.033)

Abstract

Abstract Background Beta-lactam antibiotics are associated with risk for neurotoxicity. Cefepime (FEP) may be more likely to cause neurological dysfunction (ND) due to its ability to cross the blood brain barrier and antagonize GABA receptors. In a secondary analysis, a recent randomized trial of FEP vs piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) found a relatively higher rate of ND among patients receiving FEP. We sought to determine what factors, including antibiotic choice, may be associated with ND among patients receiving FEP or P/T. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of inpatients at two hospitals in the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist system from Mar 2024 to Oct 2024. Patients ≥ 18 yrs old who received FEP or P/T on two or more consecutive calendar days were included. Only the first qualifying healthcare encounter during the study period was used for each patient. Patients with a preexisting diagnosis for ND, eg Alzheimer's disease, and those who received both FEP and P/T were excluded. ND was defined by incidence of new ICD10 code for seizure disorder, encephalopathy, delirium, agitation, altered mental status, coma, and/or confusion which was associated with the encounter when FEP or P/T was administered. Variables assessed as potential risk factors for ND included: patient characteristics (age, sex, race, BMI, comorbidities); presence of sepsis; hospital length of stay; admitting location (ICU vs non-ICU); hospital location; and antibiotic choice (FEP vs P/T). Results 2,642 patients were included in the analysis after excluding 1,461 patients for preexisting ND and 193 patients for receiving both antibiotics. 1,190 and 1,452 patients received FEP and P/T, respectively. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. 31 (1.2%) patients developed ND. Choice of FEP (1.68 vs 0.76%; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.09-4.86, p=0.033) and longer length of stay (9 vs 6 days; OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.71, p=0.013) were the only factors associated with ND. Multivariable adjustments for possible confounders revealed no impact on the association between FEP and ND (Figure 1). Conclusion Use of FEP is associated with ND as determined by new diagnoses (ICD10 codes). However, the overall rate of ND is low, and the risk of this adverse effect may not justify routine consideration when selecting empiric antibiotic therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scozzari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e72c13bf7a6f02bffaf2https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2301
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper