PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Language Teaching Research0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring L2 speech fluency of advanced learners from the perspective of linguistic self-confidence and communication confidence

View Full Paper
MSMagdalena SzyszkaPLPekka LintunenMPMirosław Pawlak

Key Points

  • The study examines how linguistic self-confidence and communication confidence relate to L2 speech fluency.
  • Data collected from 102 advanced L2 learners performing monologue tasks.
  • L2 speech fluency measured using breakdown fluency markers and speech speed indicators.
  • Confidence levels assessed using established scales and questionnaires.
  • LSC accounted for 6% of the variance in speech rate and mean length of run.
  • L2 CC and LSC jointly predicted frequency of filled pauses.
  • Significant differences in L2 fluency indices between low and high LSC groups, but most lost significance after corrections.

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between two facets of confidence in second language (L2) learning: linguistic self-confidence (LSC) and L2 communication confidence (L2 CC), and how they interplay with L2 speech fluency. The data were collected from 102 advanced L2 learners who performed a monologue task to capture their L2 speech fluency, measured in terms of breakdown fluency markers (mean length of silent pauses, frequency of filled and silent pauses), speed of speech (articulation rate), and composite indices (speech rate, phonation–time ratio, and mean length of run). The levels of L2 CC were established with the scale developed by Mystkowska-Wiertelak and Pawlak, while LSC levels were reported using a questionnaire designed for the purposes of the study. The results showed that LSC and L2 CC, while related, are distinct constructs. Regression analyses indicated that LSC accounted for 6% of the variance in speech rate and mean length of run, while L2 CC and LSC jointly predicted variation in frequency of filled pauses. Comparisons between groups with low and high levels of LSC revealed significant differences in temporal and breakdown L2 fluency indices; however, most of them lost statistical significance after applying corrections. The low and high L2 CC groups differed significantly in articulation rate. The outcomes of the study can serve as a basis for several implications for teaching and evaluating L2 speech.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szyszka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e73f13bf7a6f02bffde6https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251407238
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper