PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

5hmC as a novel liquid biopsy biomarker for colorectal cancer to enable detection and unveil tumor biology.

View Full Paper
CMChristopher MaherNNNetra NavadkarCÇCeyda Çoruh

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate 5hmC as a liquid biopsy biomarker for colorectal cancer detection.
  • Analyzed genome-wide 5hmC modifications in plasma cfDNA from CRC patients and controls.
  • Conducted differential 5hmC analysis using DESeq2 and low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS).
  • Applied Elastic Net Regression to classify cancer versus non-cancer samples based on 5hmC levels.
  • Identified differential cfDNA 5hmC levels in 319 genes distinguishing CRC from non-cancer samples.
  • Developed a 5hmC signature achieving an AUC of 0.957 for CRC detection, independent of tumor fraction.
  • Revealed increased chromatin accessibility near transcription drivers like CDX2 in CRC patients.

Abstract

228 Background: 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is a DNA epigenetic modification which regulates gene expression and is associated with active transcription. 5hmC sequencing in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables assessment of gene activity through a liquid biopsy. We profiled 5hmC in plasma cfDNA to assess its potential as a liquid biopsy biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Genome-wide 5hmC modifications were analyzed with a low-input whole-genome 5hmC sequencing method based on selective chemical labeling using cfDNA from: (i) a discovery cohort of 75 CRC patients and 150 non-cancer blood samples and (ii) a validation cohort of 72 CRC patients and 70 non-cancer blood samples. Differential 5hmC analysis between CRC and non-cancer samples was conducted using DESeq2. Low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) was performed on all cfDNA samples. Tumor fraction was estimated using ichorCNA to classify samples into high ct-fraction CRC (ct-fraction ≥0.1) and low ct-fraction CRC (ct-fraction <0.1) groups. Nucleosome profiling analysis using LP-WGS was performed to reveal chromatin accessibility patterns. Elastic Net Regression (ENR) was applied to identify differences in 5hmC levels for classifying samples as cancer or non-cancer. Results: Differential cfDNA 5hmC levels of 319 genes distinguished high ct-fraction CRC and non-cancer samples in the discovery and validation cohorts. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed increased 5hmC in genes associated with colon cancer (i.e., WNT and b-catenin signaling). Next, machine learning was used to develop a 5hmC signature in the discovery cohort which was then independently validated to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer samples (AUC 0.957), irrespective of ct-fraction. Nucleosome profiling analysis using LP-WGS revealed increased chromatin accessibility near the binding sites of active transcriptional drivers. Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 ( CDX2 ), a master transcriptional regulator of intestinal cell fate and cancer, had increased chromatin accessibility near binding sites in CRC patients relative to non-cancer samples in the discovery and validation cohorts. Importantly, CDX2 and its downstream targets had increased cfDNA 5hmC levels in CRC relative to non-cancer samples. Conclusions: Genes with differential 5hmC levels in cfDNA can discriminate between CRC and non-cancer samples. 5hmC signatures identified CRC samples independent of copy number gains or losses, which are typically used to estimate ct-fraction. Differential analysis of 5hmC and LP-WGS data reveal gene activation relevant to disease. In the context of CRC, CDX2 displayed increased chromosome accessibility in the promoters of its target genes which in turn displayed increased 5hmC levels. Further studies will focus on optimizing 5hmC-based biomarkers to monitor patient treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maher et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e73f13bf7a6f02bfff00https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper