PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-1305. Evaluation of In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

View Full Paper
GSGaurav Vijay SalunkeSBSanjay Biswas

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the in vitro synergistic effects of antimicrobial combinations against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
  • Identified 60 non-duplicate CRAB isolates using the VITEK 2 system.
  • Resistant mechanisms assessed via PCR for blaNDM and blaOXA-48.
  • Synergistic activity tested using the Broth Disk Elution method.
  • SUL+PB and SUL+PB+MEM combinations showed 100% synergy with no bacterial growth.
  • SUL+TGC and SUL+PB were highly effective (98.33% efficacy).
  • Reported effectiveness for SUL+MIN at 91.67% and SUL+AVI at 65%.

Abstract

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) presents a significant healthcare concern owing to restricted treatment alternatives and elevated mortality rates. This study assesses the in vitro synergistic effects of antimicrobial combinations to determine appropriate treatment alternatives.Table 1In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Combinations Methods Sixty non-duplicate CRAB isolates were identified and tested using the VITEK 2 system. Resistance mechanisms were determined via PCR for blaNDM and blaOXA-48. Synergistic activity of Polymyxin B (PB) + Sulbactam (SUL), Tigecycline (TGC) + SUL, Minocycline (MIN) + SUL, Sulbactam + Avibactam (SUL-AVI), and PB + Meropenem (MEM) + SUL was assessed using the Broth Disk Elution (BDE) method. Results A total of 60 clinical isolates were tested for in vitro synergy using different antibiotic combinations. Effectiveness was defined as no bacterial growth (-) in the presence of a drug combination. The most effective combinations were SUL+PB and SUL+PB+MEM, showing 100% synergy (no bacterial growth). SUL+TGC and SUL+PB were highly effective (98.33%, CI: 95.09%-101.57%), followed by SUL+MIN (91.67%, CI: 84.67%-98.66%). SUL+AVI was the least effective (65%, CI: 52.93%-77.07%) Table 1. Chi-square analysis showed no significant difference between SUL+TGC, SUL+PB, and SUL+PB+MEM (p 0.05). Advanced pairwise Z-tests also found no statistically significant differences among combinations (all p-values 0.05). Conclusion Polymyxin B-based regimens, particularly in combination with Meropenem and Sulbactum, appear highly promising for use in critically ill patients where rapid, broad-spectrum activity is paramount. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salunke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f2e313bf7a6f02c00376https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper