PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-2165. Comparison of Incidence Reporting and Outcomes of Infections in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CART) Cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies (BsAb) Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Study

View Full Paper
VTVarshini ThiruvadiAMArankesh MahadevanSASaba Asif

Key Points

  • To compare the incidence of infections and outcomes in CAR-T versus BsAb therapies for multiple myeloma.
  • Retrospective pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.
  • Analysis included patients treated with CAR-T (Ciltacabtagene, Idecabtagene) and BsAb constructs (Teclistamab, Talquetamab, Elranatanab).
  • Infection rates calculated as proportion of reported events among total events after therapy.
  • Overall infections: CAR-T 14.40% vs BsAb 32.20% (p<0.01).
  • Higher incidence of infections in CAR-T group (20.0%) compared to BsAb (6.10%; p<0.01).
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia most common in CAR-T (1.31%); cytomegalovirus infections highest in BsAb (1.79%).

Abstract

Abstract Background Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell and Bispecific Antibody (BsAb) therapies have revolutionized the management of multiple myeloma (MM). However, they are associated with an increased risk of infections, particularly due to lymphopenia, neutropenia, Immune-Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), Cytokine Release syndrome (CRS), and Immune-effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (IECHLH).Table 1Comparing incidence of infections in the presence of ICANS CRS or IECHLHFigure 1Comparing mortality outcomes from infections and immune dysregulation in the presence of CRS/ICANS/IECHLH in CART versus BsAb group represented on Forest Plot Methods The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was accessed in April 2025 to conduct the study. Therapies analyzed were CAR-T (Ciltacabtagene, Idecabtagene) and BsAb constructs (Teclistamab, Talquetamab, Elranatanab). The number of patients, cases of various infections, and immune dysfunction events were collected for each group. The association of infections with CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH was analyzed. Infection rates were calculated as the proportion of reported events per total event following therapy. Categorical comparisons between therapies were conducted using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for outcomes of infections in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH for CAR-T versus BsAb comparisons. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p-value 0.05. Results The total incidence of infections and immune dysregulation in the CAR-T versus BsAb group was 14.40% and 32.20%, statistically significant (p 0.01). Hypogammaglobulinemia had the highest incidence in the CAR-T group (1.31%), followed by fungal infections (1.20%), while cytomegalovirus infections (1.79%) were the highest in BsAb, followed by hypogammaglobulinemia (1.58%). Infections and immune dysregulation in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH were higher in CAR-T than in BsAb (20.0% vs 6.10%; p 0.01) (Table 1). The odds ratio comparing differences in outcomes in patients with infections in the presence of CRS, ICANS, or IECHLH is illustrated in the forest plot (Figure 1). Conclusion CAR-T and BsAb therapies are game-changers in treating MM but have drawbacks. Infections are the leading cause of non-relapse mortality in this group, further complicated by immune syndromes. This study underscores the importance of consensus on anti-infective prophylaxis in this patient population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thiruvadi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f2fb13bf7a6f02c00601https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2328
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of infectious complications with BCMA-directed therapies in multiple myeloma2024 · 48 citations
  2. 2Infectious complications following bispecific antibody or CAR T therapy in adult patients with hematologic malignancies: a retrospective database analysis2026
  3. 3Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review2026
  4. 4Real-world comparison of CAR T-cell therapy versus bispecific antibodies in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Infection risk factors and burden in patients treated with T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies for relapsed B-cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma2025