PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026JAMA Pediatrics9 citations

Social Media Use and Well-Being Across Adolescent Development

View Full Paper
BSB. M. SinghMZMi ZhouRCRachel Curtis

Key Points

  • To investigate associations between after-school social media use and well-being in adolescents.
  • Longitudinal cohort study of Australian students in grades 4 to 12 (2019-2022)
  • Participants self-reported after-school social media use, categorized as none, moderate, or highest
  • Well-being assessed with 8 validated indicators during annual school surveys
  • Data analyzed using mixed-effects logistic models, adjusted for demographic covariates
  • Sample included 100,991 adolescents with 173,533 observations
  • Heavy social media use linked to higher odds of low well-being among adolescents
  • Non-users also showed higher odds of low well-being in later adolescence
  • Findings consistent across survey years and robust to sensitivity analyses

Abstract

Importance Social media’s association with adolescent well-being remains debated. Heavy use has been associated with distress, while abstinence may cause missed connections. Objective To investigate 3-year longitudinal associations between after-school social media use and adolescent well-being using a large longitudinal cohort dataset modeled within a repeated cross-sectional framework. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included Australian students in grades 4 through 12 (2019-2022). After-school social media use was self-reported and grouped as none, moderate, or highest. Well-being was assessed using 8 validated indicators (eg, happiness, life satisfaction, emotional regulation), dichotomized as high vs low. Well-being was assessed concurrently with social media use during the annual school-based survey in each year of data collection. Data analysis was conducted from June to July 2025. Exposures Self-reported after-school social media use between 3 pm and 6 pm (weekdays), classified into 3 categories: none (0 h/wk), moderate (gt;0 to lt;12.5 h/wk), and highest (≥12.5 h/wk). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall well-being, measured as the mean score across 8 validated domains (happiness, optimism, life satisfaction, worry, sadness, perseverance, emotional regulation, and cognitive engagement), dichotomized as high vs low (lt;3 on a scale of 1-5). Secondary outcomes were each individual well-being indicator, similarly dichotomized. Mixed-effects logistic models were used for analyses, stratified by sex and adjusted for demographic covariates. Results The analytic sample included 100 991 adolescents, contributing 173 533 observations (86 582 49.9% observations from female participants; mean SD age, 13.5 2.2 years). A U-shaped association was observed between after-school social media use and well-being. Compared with moderate users, adolescents with the highest use had greater odds of low well-being (grades 7-9, girls: odds ratio OR, 3.13 95% CI, 2.88-3.39; boys: OR, 2.25 95% CI, 1.86-2.72), while nonusers also had higher odds of low well-being in later adolescence (grades 10-12, girls: OR, 1.79 95% CI, 1.41-2.27; boys: OR, 3.00 95% CI, 2.01-4.46). These patterns were consistent across survey years and robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of students in grades 4 through 12, social media’s association with adolescent well-being was complex and nonlinear, varying by age and sex. While heavy use was associated with poorer well-being and abstinence sometimes coincided with less favorable outcomes, these findings are observational and should be interpreted cautiously.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31513bf7a6f02c00a59https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.5619
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper