PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Remote Sensing1 citationsOpen Access

A Comparison of Self-Supervised and Supervised Deep Learning Approaches in Floating Marine Litter and Other Types of Sea-Surface Anomalies Detection

View Full Paper
OBOlga BilousovaMKMikhail KrinitskyMPMaria Pogojeva

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare supervised and self-supervised deep learning approaches for detecting marine litter and other anomalies.
  • Developed two deep learning models: supervised Visual Object Detection (YOLOv11) and self-supervised classification (MoCo + ResNet50 + CatBoost)
  • Trained models on approximately 10,000 annotated sea surface images from Barents and Kara seas
  • Evaluated performance using F1-scores for detecting marine litter and objects like birds.
  • YOLOv11 achieved a maximum F1-score of 73% in detecting birds.
  • The self-supervised approach outperformed YOLOv11 for marine litter detection with a 40% F1-score compared to 10%.
  • Findings indicate a performance trade-off between the two methodologies.

Abstract

Monitoring marine litter in the Arctic is crucial for environmental assessment, yet automated methods are needed to process large volumes of visual data. This study develops and compares two distinct machine learning approaches to automatically detect floating marine litter, birds, and other anomalies from ship-based optical imagery captured in the Barents and Kara seas. We evaluated a supervised Visual Object Detection (VOD) model (YOLOv11) against a self-supervised classification approach that combines a Momentum Contrast (MoCo) framework with a ResNet50 backbone and a CatBoost classifier. Both methods were trained and tested on a dataset of approximately 10,000 manually annotated sea surface images. Our findings reveal a significant performance trade-off between the two techniques. The YOLOv11 model excelled in detecting clearly visible objects like birds with an F1-score of 73%, compared to 67% for the classification method. However, for the primary and more challenging task of identifying marine litter, which demonstrates less clear visual representation in optical imagery, the self-supervised approach was substantially more effective, achieving a 40% F1-score, versus the 10% obtained for the VOD model. This study demonstrates that, while standard object detectors are effective for distinct objects, self-supervised learning strategies can offer a more robust solution for detecting less-defined targets like marine litter in complex sea-surface imagery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bilousova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00cf0https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper