PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-1925. Comparison of Outcomes in Obese Versus Non-Obese Patients Receiving Fluconazole and/or Micafungin for the Treatment of Candidemia

View Full Paper
AWAmber WelbornTCTravis J CarlsonGGGerard Gawrys

Key Points

  • To compare treatment outcomes of obese versus non-obese patients with candidemia receiving fluconazole and/or micafungin.
  • Retrospective cohort study
  • Included adults with candidemia admitted from January 2020 to December 2024
  • Excluded patients receiving <48 hours of treatment or resistant to both agents
  • No significant difference in treatment failure rates between obese (38%) and non-obese (32%) patients (P=0.56)
  • Median length of stay was similar: 23 days in obese vs 22 days in non-obese (P=0.96)
  • 33% of obese patients received micafungin doses > 100 mg/day (P=0.01)

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines recommend initial echinocandin therapy followed by oral azole step-down therapy for the treatment of candidemia. However, the pharmacokinetics of these medications can be altered by patient characteristics, such as obesity. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in obese versus non-obese patients with candidemia treated with fluconazole and/or micafungin. Methods This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adults with candidemia admitted from 1/1/20 - 12/1/24. Patients receiving 48 hours of fluconazole and/or micafungin, those with resistance to both agents, or those not receiving antifungals within 24 hours of positive culture were excluded. Treatment failure, the primary composite outcome comprised of 14-day mortality, 14-day microbiologic failure, and 30-day candidemia recurrence, was compared between obese (BMI 30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS). Results Ninety-six patients were included, 34 (35%) obese and 62 (65%) non-obese. Eleven (32%) obese and 7 (11%) non-obese patients received micafungin doses 100 mg/day (P = 0.01). Among patients receiving fluconazole (n = 48), the median (interquartile range, IQR) weight-normalized dose to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio was 6.6 (3.9-10.8) and 9.7 (3.3-21.2) in obese versus non-obese patients, respectively (P = 0.62). Treatment failure occurred in 13 (38%) obese and 20 (32%) non-obese patients (P=0.56). The median (IQR) LOS was 23 days in obese patients and 22 days in non-obese patients (P = 0.96). Conclusion Obesity was not associated with treatment failure in this cohort of hospitalized patients with candidemia. Nearly one-third of obese patients received micafungin doses 100 mg/day, and the weight-normalized fluconazole dose to MIC ratios did not significantly differ in obese versus non-obese patients. Depending on local epidemiologic factors, it may be prudent to consider higher doses of fluconazole and/or micafungin in obese patients with candidemia. Disclosures Travis J. Carlson, PharmD, BCIDP, Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.: Speaker bureau

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Welborn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f32713bf7a6f02c00edfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.2094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper