PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026European Review of Aging and Physical Activity2 citationsOpen Access

Physical behaviour profiles and their associations with fitness and function in older adults: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis

View Full Paper
VZVera ZymbalJMJoão Pedro de MagalhãesFBFátima de Jesus Fôlgoa Baptista Baptista

Key Points

  • The study aimed to identify physical behaviour profiles in older adults and assess their impact on fitness and function.
  • Cross-sectional study with 1,095 older Portuguese adults (≥ 65 years)
  • Assessment of physical behaviour using accelerometry
  • Evaluation of physical fitness through Senior Fitness Test and handgrip strength
  • Assessment of physical function via 12-item Composite Physical Function questionnaire
  • Generalised linear models adjusted for age examined associations between profiles and outcomes.
  • Three distinct physical behaviour profiles identified: 'balanced movers', 'intermediate movers', and 'highly sedentary'.
  • Balanced and intermediate movers showed better physical fitness and function than highly sedentary group.
  • Intermediate movers had similar performance to balanced movers on most fitness measures.

Abstract

Abstract Background Traditional variable-centred approaches often analyse physical behaviours (sedentary behaviour SB, light physical activity LPA, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity MVPA) in isolation, potentially masking their combined effects on outcomes. This study applied latent profile analysis, a person-centred approach, to identify naturally occurring physical behaviour profiles in older adults and examined their associations with physical fitness and physical function. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,095 older Portuguese adults (≥ 65 years; 765 females). SB, LPA, and MVPA were assessed using accelerometry (Actigraph; Pensacola, Florida) on the right hip and expressed as percentages of waking time. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct profiles based on these percentages. Physical fitness was evaluated by Senior Fitness Test battery and handgrip strength. Physical function was assessed using the 12-item Composite Physical Function questionnaire. Generalised linear models, adjusted for age, were used to examine associations between profiles and outcomes. Results Three distinct profiles emerged for both sexes: “balanced movers” (~ 50% SB, ~ 46% LPA, ~ 4% MVPA), “intermediate movers” (~ 66% SB, ~ 32% LPA, ~ 2% MVPA), and “highly sedentary” (~ 80% SB, ~ 20% LPA, < 1% MVPA). Compared to the “highly sedentary” groups, both “balanced movers” and “intermediate movers” demonstrated better performance on most physical fitness tests and reported higher physical function. Notably, “intermediate movers”, performed similarly to “balanced movers” in most measures. Conclusions Distinct physical behaviour profiles exist among older Portuguese adults. Profiles characterised by lower SB and higher LPA, even when not fully meeting MVPA recommendations (“intermediate movers”), were associated with better physical fitness and physical function compared to the “highly sedentary” profile. This underscores the importance of reducing SB and promoting LPA along with MVPA. By uncovering these behavioural profiles among older adults, latent profile analysis provides valuable insights to guide the development of more personalized interventions for healthy ageing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zymbal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33213bf7a6f02c01191https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00397-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper