PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Real-world molecular profile and treatment patterns in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: A Brazilian multicenter cohort.

View Full Paper
SLSofia LaraRPRenata D'Alpino PeixotoMDMauro Daniel Spina Donadio

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the molecular profiles and treatment patterns in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma among a Brazilian cohort.
  • Retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular data from advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.
  • Biomarker testing was performed for PD-L1 status, HER2, and MMR/MSI.
  • Assessment of treatment patterns, including systemic therapy and immunotherapy, was done using electronic medical records.
  • Of 334 tested GAs, the PD-L1 distribution was CPS <1 (41.0%), CPS 1–4 (13.5%), CPS ≥5 (43.4%).
  • In the biomarker-restricted TTD cohort, median time to treatment discontinuation was 6.9 months for chemo+immunotherapy compared to 5.0 months for chemotherapy alone.
  • Immunotherapy was administered to nearly half of the patients receiving first-line treatment.

Abstract

313 Background: Advanced (A) gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GA) prognosis remains poor, with limited data on molecular profiles and treatment in resource-diverse populations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and molecular data from GA patients who underwent biomarker testing in centralized laboratories between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients were categorized by PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS: <1, 1–4, ≥5), HER2, and MMR/MSI status. Treatment patterns, including systemic therapy and immunotherapy (IO), were assessed among advanced cases with electronic medical record access (AGA-EMR). Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was compared between 1L chemotherapy alone and chemo+IO. Results: A total of 334 GAs were tested for PD-L1 CPS. Distribution was: CPS <1, 41.0%; CPS 1–4, 13.5%; CPS ≥5, 43.4%; and inconclusive, 2.1%. Among 112 AGA-EMR patients (59.8% male; median age 66.6 years; 76.8% gastric; 46.4% diffuse and 25.0% intestinal histology; 54.5% M1 at diagnosis), CPS distribution was similar: 44.6% <1, 12.5% 1–4, 42.0% ≥5, and 0.9% inconclusive. MSI-H/dMMR prevalence was 8.0%, and HER2 positivity was 9.8%. A biomarker-negative subgroup (PD-L1 CPS <5, pMMR/MSS, HER2–) represented 47.3%. Systemic therapy was administered to 83.9%, primarily fluoropyrimidine–platinum chemotherapy (87.2%). Immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) was incorporated in 48.9% of 1L regimens. Across all lines, 43.8% received IO. Trastuzumab was used in 72.7% of HER2+ patients. Treatment intensity decreased with successive lines: 22.3% received 2L, 8.9% 3L, and 1.8% 4L. Among pMMR/HER2– patients, IO use strongly correlated with PD-L1 status (84.6% of CPS ≥5 vs 17.1% of CPS <5 received IO, p<0.0001). In the biomarker-restricted TTD cohort (pMMR/HER2-; chemotherapy backbone; n = 73), 41% received chemo+IO and 59% chemo alone. Median TTD was 6.9 months with chemo+IO vs 5.0 months with chemotherapy alone (log-rank p=0.04; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30–0.98). Conclusions: In this real-world multicenter cohort, treatment decisions closely followed molecular profiling, with PD-L1 status guiding IO incorporation and trastuzumab used in most HER2+ patients. Nearly half of treated patients received 1L immunotherapy, and in the biomarker-restricted pMMR/HER2– population, chemo+IO was associated with a significantly longer TTD compared with chemotherapy alone. A substantial biomarker-negative subgroup remains without targeted options, underscoring the need for broader molecular testing and novel strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33b13bf7a6f02c01264https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper