PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2002Psychological Methods11,047 citations

Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.

View Full Paper
JSJoseph L. SchaferPennsylvania State UniversityJGJohn W. Graham

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Statistical procedures for missing data have vastly improved, yet misconception and unsound practice still abound. The authors frame the missing-data problem, review methods, offer advice, and raise issues that remain unresolved. They clear up common misunderstandings regarding the missing at random (MAR) concept. They summarize the evidence against older procedures and, with few exceptions, discourage their use. They present, in both technical and practical language, 2 general approaches that come highly recommended: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian multiple imputation (MI). Newer developments are discussed, including some for dealing with missing data that are not MAR. Although not yet in the mainstream, these procedures may eventually extend the ML and MI methods that currently represent the state of the art.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schafer et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6969463b6c94db543e45b43bhttps://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper