PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Particles1 citationsOpen Access

Critical Aspects in the Modeling of Sub-GeV Calorimetric Particle Detectors: The Case Study of the High-Energy Particle Detector (HEPD-02) on Board the CSES-02 Satellite

View Full Paper
SBS. BartocciRBRoberto BattistonSBS. Beolè

Key Points

  • This work aims to improve the modeling of sub-GeV particle detectors to enhance experimental data interpretation and optimize designs.
  • Identified critical aspects in the modeling of calorimetric detectors
  • Examined the HEPD-02 detector geometry and physics models
  • Conducted data–MC comparisons using beam test data from HEPD-02
  • Highlighted significant challenges in replicating CAD geometries
  • Showed the impact of hadronic physics on detector responses
  • Presented original solutions for scintillation quenching parameterization

Abstract

The accurate simulation of sub-GeV particle detectors is essential for interpreting experimental data and optimizing detector design. This work identifies and addresses several critical aspects in modeling such detectors, taking as a case study the High-Energy Particle Detector (HEPD-02), a space-borne instrument developed within the CSES-02 mission to measure electrons in the ∼3–100 MeV range, protons and light nuclei in the ∼30–200 MeV/n. The HEPD-02 instrument consists of a silicon tracker, plastic and LYSO scintillator calorimeters, and anticoincidence systems, making it a representative example of a complex low-energy particle detector operating in Low Earth Orbit. Key challenges arise from replicating intricate detector geometries derived from CAD models, selecting appropriate hadronic physics lists for low-energy interactions, and accurately describing the detector response—particularly quenching effects in scintillators and digitization in solid-state tracking planes. Particular attention is given to three critical aspects: the precise CAD-level geometry implementation, the impact of hadronic physics models on the detector response, and the parameterization of scintillation quenching. In this study, we present original solutions to these challenges and provide data–MC comparisons using data from HEPD-02 beam tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bartocci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b25f3d2a12237a9349397https://doi.org/10.3390/particles9010006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Review of Particle Physics2024 · 3,441 citations
  2. 2ROOT — A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization2011 · 156 citations
  3. 3Average Triton Energy Deposited in Silicon per Electron-Hole Pair Produced1970 · 5 citations
  4. 4Introduction to ISO 10303—the STEP Standard for Product Data Exchange2001 · 297 citations
  5. 5Recent Developments and Validation of Geant4 Hadronic Physics2012 · 12 citations