PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery1 citations

Design of Dry Powder Inhalers: 1. Does Size Matter?

View Full Paper
JWJeffry G. WeersAlameda Applied Sciences Corporation (United States)TTThomas E. TararaAlameda Applied Sciences Corporation (United States)DMDanforth P. MillerDerry City Council

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how size metrics in inhaler design may mislead interpretations of inhalation therapies.
  • Comparison of size metrics with impaction parameters in inhalers.
  • Utilization of realistic anatomical throats and flow profiles.
  • Analysis of in vitro–in vivo correlations for inhaled drugs.
  • Imparting accurate deposition predictions by focusing on impaction parameters.
  • Elimination of fixed flow rate operation for impactors enhances realism in tests.
  • Improved correlations between laboratory and actual respiratory outcomes.

Abstract

Regional deposition of inhaled medicines in the respiratory tract is heavily influenced by inertial impaction. Despite this, the current convention is to convert impaction parameter cutoffs on stages in impactors to size cutoffs by operating the impactor at a fixed flow rate. While such a practice has utility when using impactors as a quality control tool, a focus on size metrics (e.g., mass median aerodynamic diameter MMAD and fine particle fraction FPF <5µm ) may lead to misconceptions in the interpretation of impactor data. In contrast, using metrics based on impaction parameter cutoffs (MMIP and FPF S3-F ) enables a more accurate prediction of trends in in vivo deposition with variations in device resistance, flow rate, airway size, and other dependent variables. Using impaction parameter cutoffs also eliminates the need to run the impactor at a fixed flow rate, thereby allowing realistic inspiratory flow profiles to be utilized. This, combined with the use of more realistic anatomical throats and impaction parameter metrics, enables improved in vitro–in vivo correlations to guide early formulation and device development in the spirit of Quality by Design principles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weers et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2672d2a12237a9349bd9https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251412999
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Idealhalers Versus Realhalers: Is It Possible to Bypass Deposition in the Upper Respiratory Tract?2018 · 36 citations
  2. 2In VitroAssessment of Dose Delivery Performance of Dry Powders for Inhalation2014 · 32 citations
  3. 3Improved Lung Delivery from a Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Using an Engineered PulmoSphere® Powder2002 · 150 citations
  4. 4In Vitro–In Vivo Correlations Observed With Indacaterol-Based Formulations Delivered with the Breezhaler ®2014 · 51 citations
  5. 5Inhalation of tobramycin using simulated cystic fibrosis patient profiles2016 · 43 citations