PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Journal of Radiation Research0 citationsOpen Access

A national survey of the clinical practice of surface-guided radiation therapy in Japan

View Full Paper
RYRyohei YamauchiSt. Luke's International HospitalMSMasahide SaitoUniversity of Yamanashi HospitalHKHironori KojimaKanazawa University Hospital

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the adoption and implementation of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) across Japan.
  • Surveyed 880 radiotherapy institutions in Japan from October to December 2024.
  • Collected data on institutional characteristics, quality assurance/control, and treatment procedures.
  • Administered the survey via mailing list, vendors, and Google Forms.
  • 292 institutions responded, with a 33% response rate.
  • 98 institutions reported SGRT implementation, with 50 adopting it after 2022.
  • 87% usage of SGRT was reported in breast treatment, with notable time reductions in procedures.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diffusion of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT), implementation of quality control and quality assurance strategies, established clinical workflows and user perceptions regarding the benefits and limitations of SGRT in routine practice. From October to December 2024, we surveyed 880 radiotherapy institutions in Japan regarding institutional characteristics, quality assurance/quality control, computed tomography simulation, treatment procedures and general questions regarding SGRT. The survey was distributed via mailing list and through vendors, and administered via Google Forms. A total of 292 institutions responded, corresponding to a response rate of 33%. Ninety-eight institutions reported introducing SGRT, and 50 institutions had introduced it after 2022. The highest usage rate of SGRT in breast treatment was 87%. Approximately half of the institutions performed daily checks of SGRT and radiation isocenter coincidence, as well as static accuracy, whereas 6% did not perform these checks at all. The primary functions of the SGRT system were patient positioning (94%), respiratory management (78%), patient monitoring (76%) and skin marker–less techniques (69%). Many institutions reduced or eliminated skin marking, citing simplified workflows and reduced setup time. Many respondents observed that SGRT implementation reduced both setup and treatment times for breast/chest, abdomen/pelvis and extremity procedures. SGRT has been widely embraced in Japan, offering notable clinical and workflow benefits. However, because participation in this survey was voluntary, the results may overrepresent institutions with greater awareness or adoption of SGRT. Greater standardization, broader insurance coverage and ongoing technological advancements are essential to fully realize its advantages.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yamauchi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2696d2a12237a9349da7https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf086
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surface guided radiotherapy practice in paediatric oncology: a survey on behalf of the SIOPE Radiation Oncology Working Group2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2ESTRO-ACROP guideline on surface guided radiation therapy2022 · 102 citations
  3. 3Emotional Experiences of Skin Markings Among Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy and Related Factors: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study2022 · 17 citations
  4. 4A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States2019 · 45 citations
  5. 5Surface guided radiation therapy: An international survey on current clinical practice2022 · 54 citations