PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Srce i krvni sudovi0 citationsOpen Access

Approaches for the treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A case review

DNDenis NikolovOMOktaj MaksudovIVIvan Vasilev

Key Result

In cases of SCAD, conservative treatment is appropriate for stable patients, while ongoing ischemia necessitates urgent intervention such as PCI or CABG.

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze different treatment strategies for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) through case presentations.
  • Review of two cases with SCAD, focusing on clinical presentations and interventions.
  • Utilization of coronary angiography and ECG for diagnosis.
  • Comparison of conservative and interventional treatment approaches based on patient conditions.
  • Conservative treatment was chosen for a stable female patient with SCAD, but she required surgery after an episode of chest pain.
  • An interventional approach was successful in treating a male patient with SCAD, who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents.
  • The need for careful assessment before deciding on treatment options emphasizes individualized patient care.

Structured PICO

P
Population
2 patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (a 48-year-old female with SCAD in LAD and a 46-year-old male with SCAD in RCA).
I
Intervention
Revascularization (CABG for the female patient after failed conservative management, and PCI with 4 drug-eluting stents for the male patient).
O
Outcome
Clinical course and treatment outcome

SCAD treatment should be individualized, with conservative management for stable patients and revascularization (PCI or CABG) reserved for those with ongoing ischemia.

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a tear in the wall of the epicardial coronary artery that is not caused by trauma, coronary intervention, or atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Diagnosis is made by coronary angiography, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). SCAD has been shown to be a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death. The usual clinical presentation is a picture of acute myocardial infarction. Young women represent about 70% of patients and 30% of such cases are related to the peripartum period, due to hormonal changes. Left anterior descending (LAD) is the most common site of dissection which represents 60% cases. Right coronary artery (RCA) is the second most common site (more common in men), followed by the left main coronary artery. The treatment options for this event are conservative, interventional (PCI) or surgical (CABG). The conservative approach is suitable for low-risk stable patients, but in the presence of ongoing ischemia, cardiogenic shock or sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation - an intervention should be performed. In this current article we will present two cases of SCAD which took a completely different path in regards of the treatment approach that was chosen. The first case is a 48-years old female who was admitted in cardiology department due to the chest pain and dynamic ECG changes. The coronary angiography revealed a SCAD in LAD, but due to the stable state of the patient we decided to go with conservative treatment. However, after 12 hours, the patient reported another episode of chest pain with the ECG showing ST-elevations in precordial leads. Due to the high complexity of the intervention we decided to refer the patient for operation. CABG was performed (LIMA-LAD) and the patient was discharged five days post operation. Our second case as a 46-years-old man presenting with ECG changes for inferior AMI. The angiography revealed a SCAD in RCA. Due to ongoing chest pain we decided to go for an interventional treatment - PCI was successfully performed with implantation of four drug-eluting stents. SCAD is a condition that can occur in everyday practice in patients with ACS and can be expected as the cause of ACS in young patients without significant risk factors. There is no universal principal regarding the treatment method, so rushing to perform an intervention (PCI or CABG) is not recommended, unless there is ongoing ischemia. In some of the cases, the dissection regenerates spontaneously, but in the acute phase, intervention or surgery is sometimes required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nikolov et al. (2023) studied this question. In cases of SCAD, conservative treatment is appropriate for stable patients, while ongoing ischemia necessitates urgent intervention such as PCI or CABG.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b26b2d2a12237a9349f35https://doi.org/10.5937/siks2304105n
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection2014 · 632 citations
  2. 2Clinical Features, Management, and Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection2012 · 933 citations
  3. 3European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection2018 · 688 citations
  4. 4Contemporary Review on Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection2016 · 579 citations
  5. 5Spontaneous coronary artery dissection2017 · 317 citations