PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Antibiotics1 citationsOpen Access

Antimicrobial Use and Epidemiological Resistance Profiles of Commensal Escherichia coli from Swine Farms in Córdoba, Argentina

View Full Paper
NLNicolás Javier LitterioMZMaría del Pilar ZarazagaALAugusto Matías Lorenzutti

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess antimicrobial use and characterize resistance profiles of commensal E. coli from swine farms in Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Conducted an observational cross-sectional study in 19 swine farms in Córdoba during 2023.
  • Collected data on antimicrobial use practices including prophylaxis and treatment.
  • Obtained 437 E. coli isolates from fecal samples and determined minimum inhibitory concentrations for 10 antimicrobials.
  • Classified non-wild-type phenotypes and assessed multidrug resistance according to EUCAST ECOFFs.
  • 89.5% of farms practiced frequent prophylactic antimicrobial use.
  • High non-wild-type proportions ranged from 50.6% to 92% for several antimicrobials.
  • Detected extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing phenotypes in isolates.
  • 92% of isolates classified as multidrug-resistant E. coli, showing distribution across all production categories.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The expansion of intensive swine production in Córdoba, Argentina, underscores the need to assess the risks associated with antimicrobial (AM) use, whose extensive application has driven antimicrobial resistance, a major global threat within the One Health framework. This study aimed to characterize AM use practices and evaluate the epidemiological resistance profiles (non-wild-type phenotypes, NWT) of commensal Escherichia coli of fecal origin from swine farms, using epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) as a surveillance criterion. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 19 farrow-to-finish farms in Córdoba during 2023. Information on AM use (prophylaxis, metaphylaxis, treatment) across production categories was collected. A total of 437 E. coli isolates were obtained from fecal samples, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 10 AMs of critical importance for human and animal health. NWT phenotypes were classified according to EUCAST ECOFFs, and multidrug resistance (MDR) was assessed. Results: AM use was frequent and predominantly prophylactic (89.5% of farms), mainly through mass medication (66.3%), with macrolides and amoxicillin being the most commonly administered AMs. NWT proportions were extremely high (90–92%) for ampicillin, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol and substantial for ciprofloxacin (50.6%), sulfamethoxazole (68.2%), and trimethoprim (44.9%). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing phenotypes were detected. Alarmingly, 92% of isolates were classified as MDR E. coli, with homogeneous distribution across production categories. Conclusions: Findings reveal intensive and largely empirical AM use that has consolidated a stable intestinal resistome in the swine population. High MDR levels, even in categories with limited direct AM exposure or involving banned compounds, suggest that co-selection and horizontal gene transfer are key drivers of resistance. This scenario highlights the urgent need to strengthen integrated surveillance and promote prudent AM use strategies under the One Health approach to preserve therapeutic efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Litterio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b26d7d2a12237a934a20chttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15010086
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper