PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Hydrological Processes0 citations

Slope Position Controls Temporal Stability and Estimation Accuracy of Deep‐Layer Soil Moisture on the Chinese Loess Plateau

View Full Paper
SDShuang DongXFXiangguo FanYJYuhua Jia

Key Points

  • To analyze how slope position influences the temporal stability and estimation accuracy of available soil moisture on the Chinese Loess Plateau.
  • Examined soil moisture from various slope positions (top, middle, bottom)
  • Calculated several accuracy metrics including RMSE, MABE, and NSE
  • Identified representative soil layers for moisture estimation using statistical indices
  • Soil moisture dynamics showed significant variability between slope positions
  • Bottom slope's soil layer below 200 cm exhibited a correlation coefficient of 0.96
  • Middle slope provided the most reliable soil moisture estimations
  • Mean profile soil moisture estimation was more accurate than deep soil moisture, with RMSE values lower at middle slope positions

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spatiotemporal variability of available soil moisture (ASM) complicates soil water resource management and vegetation restoration in the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP). Our objectives were to investigate the spatial variability and temporal stability of ASM at different slope positions and estimate deep and mean profile ASM using ASM from representative soil layers. The mean relative difference (MRD), associated standard deviation of relative difference (SDRD), index of temporal stability (ITS), mean absolute value of bias error (MABE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) were used to identify representative soil layers. The estimation accuracy was verified by absolute error (AE), relative error (RE), RMSE and Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE). The results suggested that (1) the dynamics of ASM exhibited complexity. The ASM for the top, middle and bottom slopes varied within the range of 5.76%–14.24%, 5.85%–10.74% and 3.38%–6.69%, respectively. (2) The correlations of ASM amongst different soil layers varied across slope positions. The highly significant positive correlation was observed below 200 cm soil layer at the bottom slope ( r = 0.96, p < 0.001). (3) The ASM estimation at the middle slope was more reliable than other slope positions. The representative soil layer (600–700 cm) explained 78.50% and 94.00% variability of deep and mean profile ASM, respectively. (4) The estimation for mean profile ASM was more accurate than deep ASM. The RMSEs were 1.95% and 1.84%, 1.92% and 0.94%, 2.70% and 1.84% for deep and mean profile ASM at the top, middle and bottom slopes, respectively. This work proposes an indirect method for determining mean profile ASM in the fragmented terrain area on the CLP; it also can reliably estimate deep soil moisture that cannot be measured due to the presence of Calcaric Regosol.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c772aeb60fb80d13956f8https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper