PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Annals of Plastic Surgery0 citations

Timing and Outcomes of Free Flap Reconstruction in High-Voltage Electrical Burns of the Extremities

View Full Paper
GCGaurav ChaturvediASAbhinav SinghVCVed Prakash Rao Cheruvu

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of timing on free flap reconstruction effectiveness following high-voltage electrical burns.
  • Retrospective analysis of 23 patients with full-thickness high-voltage electrical burns.
  • Patients grouped by timing of flap coverage: early (<21 days) and delayed (>21 days after debridements).
  • Evaluated outcomes included flap survival, complications, reexploration rates, operative time, and hospital stay.
  • Overall flap survival rate was 87% (20 out of 23 patients).
  • Flap failure rates were low: 1 of 6 in the early group, 2 of 17 in the delayed group (P = 1.00).
  • Early flap group had higher complications (66.7%) than delayed (47.1%); however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.34).
  • Operative time and hospital stays were longer in the delayed group but without significant differences.

Abstract

Background High-voltage electrical burns of the extremities often result in deep tissue destruction with exposure of vital structures, necessitating free flap reconstruction. However, the optimal timing for reconstruction remains uncertain, particularly in the presence of evolving tissue viability. Methods This retrospective study included 23 patients with full-thickness high-voltage electrical burns involving the extremities who underwent free flap reconstruction. Patients were divided into two groups based on timing of flap coverage: early (21 days, after at least 2 debridements). Outcomes assessed included flap survival, complications, reexploration rate, operative time, and hospital stay. Results The cohort was predominantly male (male-to-female ratio of 10:1) with an age range of 15 to 60 years. The upper limb was involved in 16 patients; and the lower limb, in 7. The overall flap survival rate was 87% (20/23). Flap failure occurred in 1 of 6 early cases and 2 of 17 delayed cases ( P = 1.00). Complications were more common in the early group (66.7%) compared to the delayed group (47.1%) but were not statistically significant ( P = 0.34). Four flaps required reexploration, with one successfully salvaged. Operative time and hospital stay were slightly longer in the delayed group but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Free flap reconstruction remains a reliable option for limb salvage in high-voltage electrical burns. A biologically timed approach—delaying reconstruction until tissue demarcation and vascular stability—may minimize complications while maintaining high flap survival rates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaturvedi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c774feb60fb80d1395852https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment of Electrical Burns By Single Debridement Followed By Free-Flap Coverage: How Important Is Timing?2004 · 8 citations
  2. 2The Use of Free Flaps in Burn Patients1988 · 78 citations
  3. 3Acute burn induced coagulopathy2013 · 87 citations
  4. 4CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF FREE FLAP TRANSFER IN THE BURN PATIENT1975 · 38 citations
  5. 5Meta-analysis of Timing for Microsurgical Free-Flap Reconstruction for Lower Limb Injury: Evaluation of the Godina Principles2018 · 69 citations