PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Force-velocity coupling limits human adaptation in physical human–robot interaction

View Full Paper
MEMahdiar EdrakiHSHélène SerrePMPauline Maurice

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how human movements adapt to varying robot velocities and their implications for physical interactions.
  • Conducted two experiments with humans tracking robots along elliptic paths with different velocity profiles.
  • Monitored involuntary forces during robot movements with constant velocity and varying angular velocities.
  • Tested human adaptation through three practice sessions with and without real-time visual feedback.
  • Involuntary forces increased with constant robot velocities and exaggerated velocity-curvature scaling.
  • Higher angular velocities in robots resulted in greater tangential and normal forces from humans.
  • Interaction forces decreased for non-biological profiles only when real-time visual feedback was provided, showing adaptive learning.

Abstract

Abstract In physical human–robot interaction, both humans and robots need to adapt to ensure synergetic behavior. This study investigated how humans respond to robots moving with different velocity profiles. In unconstrained human movements, velocity scales with the trajectory’s curvature, i.e., moving fast at linear segments while slowing down at curved segments. Two experiments examined humans tracking a robot that traced an elliptic path with different velocity profiles, while instructed to minimize interaction forces. Results showed involuntary forces were higher when the robot moved with constant velocity or exaggerated the biological velocity-curvature scaling. Specifically, higher angular velocities in the robot were associated with greater tangential and normal forces. Experiment 1 tested whether biomechanical constraints caused these forces by reversing movement direction, but observed differences were small. Experiment 2 explored human adaptation across three practice sessions and found that interaction forces decreased for non-biological profiles only when real-time visual feedback was provided. The force-velocity modulations weakened, indicating that humans learned to predict and compensate for inertial forces. These findings highlight the need to consider human motor limitations and learning processes in physical interaction. The results have practical implications for collaborative and wearable robots where physical contact and coordination between humans and robots are critical.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Edraki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77d4eb60fb80d13960a8https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34959-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper