PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Journal of Mathematics1 citationsOpen Access

Delving Into the Depths of the Properties and Behavior of Bipolar Pythagorean Neutrosophic Metric Spaces: A Theoretical Analysis

View Full Paper
ANAkiladevi NatarajanSRSanthi RathinasamyPDPrasantha Bharathi Dhandapani

Key Points

  • The central aim is to formalize bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy sets within a mathematical framework for application in decision-making contexts.
  • Formal definitions and characterizations of bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy topological spaces.
  • Development of two distance measures—the BPNF Hamming metric and its normalized variant.
  • Introduction of a BPNF inclusion measure to capture containment relationships.
  • Comparative analysis with existing fuzzy models and counterexamples to illustrate the advantages of BPNF sets.
  • Implementation in a multicriteria decision-making example with sensitivity analysis.
  • Established a robust mathematical foundation for bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic metric spaces and their properties.
  • Developed effective distance measures enabling precise comparisons under uncertainty.
  • Showed that BPNF sets outperform traditional models in handling contradictory evidence and dual perspectives.
  • Provided computational insights into the scalability and limitations of the proposed framework.

Abstract

This paper advances the theory of bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy (BPNF) sets by establishing their formalization within a topological and metric framework, while also demonstrating their role in decision‐making under uncertainty. The main contributions are as follows: (1) definition and characterization of BPNF topological spaces, providing a rigorous foundation for theoretical exploration; (2) development of two distance measures—the BPNF Hamming metric and its normalized variant—that enable precise comparison of BPNF sets under indeterminacy, Pythagorean constraints, and bipolarity; (3) introduction of a BPNF inclusion measure for capturing complex containment relationships, supported by formal proofs; (4) comparative discussion with existing models (bipolar fuzzy, Pythagorean fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets), including counterexamples that justify the need for BPNF sets; (5) demonstration of the robustness and applicability of these tools through a multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) example and sensitivity analysis. The proposed approach addresses challenges in modeling contradictory evidence, hesitation, and dual perspectives, offering advantages for pattern recognition, image processing, and uncertainty analysis. A discussion of computational complexity, scalability, advantages, and limitations is also provided. Overall, the paper delivers a unified and practical framework for reasoning with bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic information in complex real‐world environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Natarajan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77d4eb60fb80d13961bdhttps://doi.org/10.1155/jom/6683333
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Generalization of Fermatean Fuzzy Set and Implementation of Fermatean Fuzzy PROMETHEE II Method for Decision Making via PROMETHEE GAIA2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Einstein Aggregation Operator Technique in Circular Fermatean Fuzzy Environment for MCDM2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Modern Approach in Pattern Recognition Using Circular Fermatean Fuzzy Similarity Measure for Decision Making with Practical Applications2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4A Hybrid Plithogenic Decision-Making Approach with Quality Function Deployment for Selecting Supply Chain Sustainability Metrics2019 · 67 citations
  5. 5Utilising neutrosophic theory to solve transition difficulties of IoT-based enterprises2019 · 72 citations