PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Polarity-Driven Selective Adsorption of Quercetin on Kaolinite: An Integrated DFT and Monte Carlo Study

View Full Paper
AAAbdelilah AyadAHAchraf HarrouAHAbdelouahad El Himri

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the molecular mechanisms of quercetin adsorption on kaolinite surfaces, emphasizing polarity effects.
  • Utilized Monte Carlo sampling and Density Functional Theory (DFT) for atomistic modeling.
  • Compared quercetin adsorption on hydrophilic (001) and hydrophobic (00-1) surfaces of kaolinite.
  • Analyzed charge transfer and hydrogen bonding interactions in relation to adsorption energy.
  • Strong adsorption on the hydrophilic surface with an energy of −206.65 kJ mol−1 and five hydrogen bonds.
  • Weaker adsorption on the hydrophobic surface with −147.16 kJ mol−1, primarily through van der Waals interactions.
  • Net charge transfer was −0.198 e for the hydrophilic surface compared to −0.083 e for the hydrophobic surface.

Abstract

Quercetin’s therapeutic potential is limited by its poor water solubility and rapid degradation. Natural clay minerals such as kaolinite present sustainable platforms for drug delivery, yet the molecular mechanisms of drug encapsulation are not fully understood. Specifically, the role of kaolinite’s structural polarity, its hydrophilic aluminol (001) and hydrophobic siloxane (00-1) basal surfaces, in selective drug adsorption remains unexplored. This study combines Monte Carlo sampling and Density Functional Theory (DFT) to provide the first quantitative, atomistic comparison of quercetin adsorption on both kaolinite surfaces. The results demonstrate a pronounced polarity-driven selectivity. Strong, exothermic adsorption (−206.65 kJ mol−1) occurs on the hydrophilic (001) surface, stabilized by a network of five hydrogen bonds. In contrast, the hydrophobic (00-1) surface exhibits significantly weaker sorption (−147.16 kJ mol−1), dominated by van der Waals interactions. Charge-transfer analysis shows that the hydrophilic (001) surface exhibits a net charge transfer of −0.198 e, approximately 2.4 times greater than that of the hydrophobic (00-1) surface (−0.083 e), consistent with differential electron density maps and partial density of states. By linking hydrogen bonding and charge transfer to adsorption energy, these results elucidate how surface polarity dictates drug encapsulation. This work establishes a predictive framework for designing kaolinite-based nanocarriers with optimized stability, bioavailability, and controlled release, guiding the development of sustainable drug delivery systems. It is noted that this DFT study models adsorption at 0 K using periodic slab models in a vacuum.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ayad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77f1eb60fb80d139629bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma19020368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper