PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Breast Cancer Research0 citationsOpen Access

Estrogen metabolism pathways in pregnancy and subsequent breast cancer risk: a prospective follow-up study

View Full Paper
RTRebeccaa TroisiRFR. T. FalkHSH. M. Surcel

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate how estrogen metabolism during pregnancy affects the risk of hormone receptor negative breast cancer later in life.
  • Conducted a population-based case-control study in women aged 19-39 in Finland.
  • Measured estrogens and metabolites using LC-MS/MS in serum from first and second trimesters.
  • Matched cases (449 ER-/PR-) and controls (449) based on various factors including age and parity.
  • Estimated associations using odds ratios (ORs) from conditional logistic regression models.
  • Total estrogens were positively associated with ER-/PR- breast cancer (OR 1.16).
  • Specific metabolites in the 16-pathway showed positive associations, including estriol and 16-epiestriol (ORs around 1.11).
  • No clear association was found with the 2:16 hydroxylation ratio.
  • Results were consistent even for cases diagnosed within 15 years after pregnancy.

Abstract

Abstract Background In the years following pregnancy, breast cancer risk is elevated, particularly for hormone receptor negative (HR-) tumors. Exposure to high maternal circulating estrogens, when the breast is vastly remodeling in structure and morphology, has been associated with HR- tumor risk. Estrogen metabolite profiles in nonpregnant women, notably the ratio of 2:16 hydroxylation (OH) pathway metabolites, are associated with postmenopausal breast cancer development; whether estrogen metabolism during pregnancy influences subsequent HR- breast cancer risk is unknown. Methods We conducted a population-based case–control study in women 19–39 years identified in the Finnish Maternity Cohort Biobank and linked with the Finnish Cancer Registry to identify breast cancer diagnoses within 20 years of pregnancy. Estrogens and metabolites were measured using highly reliable and sensitive LC–MS/MS methods in serum collected during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Included were invasive, ER-/PR- breast cancer cases ( n = 449) and controls ( n = 449) matched on maternal age at index pregnancy, parity, calendar year of serum collection, gestational week of blood collection, and number of sample freeze/thaw cycles. Associations between the estrogens and breast cancer risk were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from conditional logistic regression models. Results The median years of follow-up between blood collection and breast cancer diagnosis/control selection was 9 (range 0–19). Ninety-three percent of cases were < 50 years of age at breast cancer diagnosis. Total estrogens were positively associated with ER-/PR- breast cancer (OR associated with a doubling of total estrogens 1.16; 95% CI 1.02–1.32), as were metabolites in the 16-pathway including estriol OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01–1.22, 16-epiestriol OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01–1.21), 17-epiestriol OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01–1.13, and total 16-hydroxylation pathway metabolites OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00–1.24. There was no clear association with the ratio of 2:16 hydroxylation pathway metabolites. Some associations differed by parity, age at diagnosis, and gestational timing of blood collection, but interactions were not statistically significant. Results were similar when restricted to cases occurring within 15 years since pregnancy. Conclusion This prospective study demonstrated positive associations of estrogen metabolites in pregnancy and risk of mostly premenopausal ER-/PR- breast cancer, but the magnitudes varied by metabolite. No strong or consistent pattern for one metabolic pathway emerged suggesting that total estrogen concentrations during pregnancy are associated with subsequent HR- breast cancer development, regardless of how they are metabolized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Troisi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c785beb60fb80d139681bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02204-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper