PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026American Journal of Industrial Medicine0 citations

The Combined Effect of Psychosocial Safety Climate and OHS Vulnerabilities on Workplace Injury Risks

View Full Paper
MPMarta PienkowskiMDMaureen F. DollardPSP M Smith

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how psychosocial safety climate and OHS vulnerabilities interact to influence workplace injury risks.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional online survey among workers in British Columbia
  • Measured physical and psychological injuries alongside demographic and job-related factors
  • Utilized PSC-12 scale for assessment of psychosocial safety climate
  • Employed OHS-V index to evaluate occupational health and safety vulnerabilities
  • Used adjusted regression models to estimate associations and effects
  • High-risk PSC and OHS-V environments linked to significant increase in psychological injuries
  • Risk ratios for psychological injuries: PSC RR = 3.09, OHS-V RR = 4.78
  • High-risk conditions also associated with increased physical injuries
  • Risk ratios for physical injuries: PSC RR = 2.13, OHS-V RR = 3.32
  • Combined risk of both factors showed a RR of 10.08 for psychological injuries

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Physical and psychological workplace injuries present serious risks to employee well‐being, productivity, and public health. More fully understanding the combined role of the psychosocial and physical work environments in increasing the risk of work injuries is an important public health concern. We explored the relationship between psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and occupational health and safety vulnerability (OHS‐V) and their combined impact on work‐related physical and psychological injuries. Methods Workers in British Columbia completed a cross‐sectional online survey, measuring injuries, demographic, and job‐related covariates. The PSC‐12 scale assessed management priorities, consultation, and communication, while the OHS‐V index evaluated hazards and protections. Adjusted regression models estimated the risk ratios associated with OHS‐V and PSC on injury, and additive effects between PSC/OHS exposures and injury were explored. Results High‐risk PSC and OHS‐V environments were independently associated with increased risk of both psychological (RR = 3.09, 95% CI = 2.60–3.66 and RR = 4.78, 95% CI = 3.82–5.97, respectively) and physical injury (RR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.88–2.41 and RR = 3.32, 95% CI = 2.89–3.82, respectively). The combined effect of high‐risk PSC and OHS‐V showed additive impacts, with the combination of high‐risk PSC and OHS‐V environments associated with an RR of 10.08 (95% CI = 4.48–22.70) for psychological injuries and an RR of 4.77 (95% CI = 2.61–8.71) for physical injuries. Conclusion This study underscores the importance of addressing both psychosocial and physical safety factors to prevent physical and psychological injury. Targeting both psychosocial and physical hazards in combination can reduce the incidence of both types of injuries, promoting a healthier, more productive workforce.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pienkowski et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c785beb60fb80d1396899https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper