PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Starch - Stärke0 citationsOpen Access

A Density‐Corrected Method for Accurate Glucose Quantification During High‐Solids Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn

View Full Paper
DFDaniel Oluwagbotemi FasheunRBRodrigo da Rocha Olivieri de BarrosASAyla Sant'Ana da Silva

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a method that corrects glucose quantification by accounting for hydrolysate density during enzymatic hydrolysis of corn.
  • Developed a density-corrected calculation for glucose quantification.
  • Validated the method by comparing results to traditional uncorrected methods.
  • Conducted theoretical modeling to predict discrepancies in glucose concentrations.
  • Performed experimental hydrolysis at a solids loading of 40%.
  • Analyzed the impact of solids loading from 5% to 50% on glucose estimation.
  • The uncorrected method overestimated glucose concentration by about 15% after 24 hours.
  • Corrected glucose yield was calculated at 92.9%, compared to an inflated 106.5% yield from the uncorrected method.
  • The discrepancy in glucose quantification increased with higher solids loading.
  • Density effects were identified as a significant source of analytical error.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Standard glucose assays in high‐solids enzymatic hydrolysis often ignore hydrolysate density, which inflates concentrations and yields. To address this critical flaw, this research develops and validates a density‐corrected calculation that incorporates the measured hydrolysate density and quantify the error associated with the common, density‐ignored approach. Theoretical modeling predicted a substantial overestimation by the uncorrected method, a finding confirmed during the 40% solids hydrolysis of extruded corn. Experimentally, the uncorrected method progressively overestimated the true glucose concentration, with the discrepancy reaching approximately 15% after 24 h. This resulted in a significantly inflated apparent glucose yield of 106.5% compared to the plausible 92.9% yield calculated with the corrected calculation. A theoretical analysis across 5%–50% solids loading shows the discrepancy grows with loading and remains robust to assumptions about minor soluble non‐starch components. The results demonstrate that density effects are a primary source of analytical error under the high‐titer conditions targeted for process intensification. Incorporating the measured hydrolysate density restores mass‐balanced concentrations and yields, enabling reliable monitoring and fair benchmarking of high‐solids starch conversion for food ingredients and bioprocess feedstocks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fasheun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c7877eb60fb80d1396a62https://doi.org/10.1002/star.70159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper