PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 8, 1985Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences4,649 citations

Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer

View Full Paper
DDDavid Deutsch

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract It is argued that underlying the Church–Turing hypothesis there is an implicit physical assertion. Here, this assertion is presented explicitly as a physical principle: ‘every finitely realizible physical system can be perfectly simulated by a universal model computing machine operating by finite means’. Classical physics and the universal Turing machine, because the former is continuous and the latter discrete, do not obey the principle, at least in the strong form above. A class of model computing machines that is the quantum generalization of the class of Turing machines is described, and it is shown that quantum theory and the 'universal quantum computer’ are compatible with the principle. Computing machines resembling the universal quantum computer could, in principle, be built and would have many remarkable properties not reproducible by any Turing machine. These do not include the computation of non-recursive functions, but they do include ‘quantum parallelism’, a method by which certain probabilistic tasks can be performed faster by a universal quantum computer than by any classical restriction of it. The intuitive explanation of these properties places an intolerable strain on all interpretations of quantum theory other than Everett’s. Some of the numerous connections between the quantum theory of computation and the rest of physics are explored. Quantum complexity theory allows a physically more reasonable definition of the ‘complexity’ or ‘knowledge’ in a physical system than does classical complexity theory.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David Deutsch (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f16b250a360e9ca1198fehttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1985.0070
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox1964 · 12,367 citations
  2. 2Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid.1980 · 1,932 citations
  3. 3On quantum-mechanical automata1983 · 89 citations
  4. 4Church's Thesis and Principles for Mechanisms1980 · 331 citations
  5. 5The Logic of Scientific Discovery2013 · 7,810 citations