PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Nature Communications8 citationsOpen Access

Aperiodic 1/f noise drives ripple activity in humans

View Full Paper
FSFrank J. van SchalkwijkRHRandolph F. Helfrich

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate how 1/f noise affects the detection of ripple activity in the human brain, particularly during different states of wakefulness and sleep.
  • Analyzed sharp-wave ripple detection using five common algorithms across three intracranial EEG studies.
  • Examined the impact of background activity modulation on ripple detection in various conditions and contexts.
  • Simulated scenarios to estimate the false positive rate associated with ripple detection.
  • Approximately 77% of detected awake ripples in the medial temporal lobe were identified as false positives due to 1/f noise.
  • Task-related modulation of 1/f noise contributed to misleading ripple activity during cognitive tasks.
  • Specific conditions were identified where ripple detections are less affected by noise.

Abstract

Abstract Sharp-wave ripples (SWR) are central for cognition and hallmark sleep in the rodent hippocampus. Recently, ripple-like activity was also observed in the human hippocampus and neocortex during wakefulness and sleep. However, ripple detection across brain states and cortical regions remains challenging. We demonstrate that putative ripples largely index noise originating from region-, state-, and demand-dependent modulation of cortical background activity. We establish the noise sensitivity for five common detection algorithms across three intracranial EEG studies during sleep and cognitive engagement. On average, 77% of awake ripples in the medial temporal lobe, including the hippocampus, reflect false positives within the 1/ f χ noise floor. We also report task-related 1/ f χ modulations that lead to spurious ripple activity, and demonstrate scenarios where ripple detections are less impacted by noise. Our results offer a simulation-based approach to estimate the false positive rate and demonstrate the importance of 1/ f χ activity for state- and context-dependent cortical processing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schalkwijk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a469e64f732b51ee8d8https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68404-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fractal cycles of sleep, a new aperiodic activity-based definition of sleep cycles2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2The organization of recent and remote memories2005 · 2,165 citations
  3. 3Communication between neocortex and hippocampus during sleep in rodents2003 · 982 citations
  4. 4Human REM sleep recalibrates neural activity in support of memory formation2023 · 79 citations
  5. 5Replay and Ripples in Humans2025 · 12 citations