PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems1 citationsOpen Access

A Bidding Strategy to Address Risks of Virtual Power Plants in the Day‐Ahead Electricity Market

View Full Paper
YDY DongJSJuan SuYXYuantian Xue

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve market participation and economic returns for virtual power plants through an innovative bidding strategy.
  • Developed a price-acceptance bidding strategy for virtual power plants
  • Analyzed market participation success rates under different bidding scenarios
  • Compared financial outcomes between VPPs and traditional generators/load aggregators
  • The proposed strategy significantly enhances VPP resilience to market risks
  • It mitigates negative impacts of price volatility and forecasting errors on financial returns
  • VPPs using the strategy showed higher success rates in market participation compared to independent bidding.

Abstract

Virtual power plants (VPPs) can aggregate distributed resources across various nodes to participate and collaborate in electricity market trading. Unlike traditional standalone generators or load aggregators, this study leverages the dual role of VPPs as producers and consumers. It introduces a natural risk–hedging mechanism and proposes a price‐acceptance bidding strategy for VPPs in the day‐ahead spot market, which primarily relies on electricity price forecasts. This strategy is compared with scenarios where distributed resources or traditional generators/load aggregators bid independently. The analysis focuses on the success rate of market participation and the actual financial returns. The findings indicate that the proposed strategy based on the natural risk–hedging mechanism substantially enhances the resilience of VPPs in managing market risks and effectively mitigates the negative impacts of price volatility and forecasting errors on their economic benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1a9f9e64f732b51eef1fhttps://doi.org/10.1155/etep/5283425
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk hedging for gas power generation considering power-to-gas energy storage in three different electricity markets2021 · 24 citations
  2. 2Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage2017 · 524 citations
  3. 3Optimal load dispatch of community microgrid with deep learning based solar power and load forecasting2019 · 399 citations
  4. 4A novel electricity consumption forecasting model based on kernel extreme learning machine-with generalized maximum correntropy criterion2022 · 11 citations
  5. 5Hedging strategies in energy markets: The case of electricity retailers2015 · 76 citations