PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Journal of Behavioral Education2 citationsOpen Access

A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Posterior Predictive Checking for Single-Case Researchers

View Full Paper
PGPaulina GrekovJPJames E. Pustejovsky

Key Points

  • The aim is to provide a gentle introduction to Bayesian posterior predictive checking for evaluating statistical models in single-case research.
  • Introduced Bayesian posterior predictive checking (PPC) for model assessment.
  • Focused on data features important for visual analysis.
  • Demonstrated PPC through graphical representations.
  • Re-analyzed data from two single-case studies involving interventions.
  • PPC effectively assesses the plausibility of statistical models in single-case designs.
  • Graphical representations of PPC are helpful for understanding model comparisons.
  • Found that focusing on key data features enhances visual assessments.

Abstract

Abstract Although researchers typically rely on visual analysis to draw conclusions about functional relations in single-case designs, a growing collection of statistical methods have been proposed to augment visual assessment. With the introduction of increasingly complex statistical models, single-case researchers need stategies for evaluating their plausibility and utility. One potentially useful method for such model assessment is Bayesian posterior predictive checking (PPC), which involves simulating artificial data based on an estimated model and comparing the features of the simulated data to features of actual data. We provide a non-technical introduction to the use of PPCs for assessing the plausibility of statistical models for SCD data. We propose that PPCs should focus on data features that are of central interest in visual analysis. We demonstrate how PPCs can be represented in graphical form. We illustrate use of PPCs by re-analyzing data from two previously conducted studies: an across-participant multiple-baseline design assessing an oral reading fluency intervention and a reversal design investigating the effects of a group contingency intervention on inappropriate verbalizations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grekov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1b189e64f732b51ef16ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-025-09613-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper