PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 20, 2026Journal of AOAC International0 citations

Water Determination in Plants by Karl Fischer with Extraction

View Full Paper
CMCuiying MaJAJesse J. AplinNLNadine Lo

Key Points

  • This research aims to find an environmentally friendly method for determining water content in plant materials using the Karl Fischer test.
  • Developed a new KF direct titration method with extraction using formamide as a solvent.
  • Validated the method for accuracy, repeatability, and robustness in measuring water content.
  • Compared results with loss on drying (LOD) and direct titration using different solvents.
  • The new method accurately determined water content in various plant species and parts.
  • Validation criteria were successfully met, confirming the reliability of the new approach.
  • Differences in water content results were observed when compared to traditional methods.

Abstract

Abstract Background Water determination for plant materials generally uses loss on drying (LOD) methods. The azeotropic-toluene distillation (ATD) method is often used in pharmacopeial and food compendial monographs to determine the water content of plant materials containing volatile components because LOD will lose both water and volatile components. ATD is an environmentally hazardous method since it uses relatively large amounts of toluene with distillation. Objective To seek a greener approach for water determination in plant materials, USP 921 Water Determination, Method I, also known as the Karl Fischer (KF) test, is recommended due to its efficiency, specificity, and accuracy. However, it may be difficult to determine water content of plant materials using direct titration since water is tightly trapped in plant cells. An alternative approach is needed. Methods The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) laboratory therefore developed and validated an alternative method—KF direct titration with extraction using formamide as the extraction solvent. Results The validation results demonstrated that the newly developed method met the required criteria for accuracy, repeatability and robustness8. Conclusion Using the newly established method, the water content in different species with different plant parts including fruit peel, root, rhizome, bark, cremocarp and bulb was effectively determined. Highlights The results generated using the KF direct titration with extraction were also compared with results of LOD applying different heating times and direct titration using different solvents (see Table 1). The differences in the results between the methods will be discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696f1b189e64f732b51ef17fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Karl Fischer titration2024 · 33 citations
  2. 2Metrological Assessment of Analytical Procedures Used for Semi-micro and Micro Determination of Water in Lyophilisates2024
  3. 3Water Activity as a Primary Indicator of Moisture in Lyophilized Products: Linking Non-Destructive Headspace Analysis to Total Moisture via Moisture Sorption Isotherms2026
  4. 4Recommendations for the Content of a Product Specification File: Water (Karl Fischer Method)2024
  5. 5Determination of Water Content in Organic Compounds Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ( 1 H‐NMR) Spectroscopy2026 · 2 citations