PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Sensors1 citationsOpen Access

Validation of a Markerless Multi-Camera Pipeline for Bouldering Fall Kinematics

View Full Paper
NCNathan CarretierEBErwan BeurienneMBMarie-Hélène Beauséjour

Key Points

  • This research aimed to validate a markerless multi-camera system for measuring fall kinematics in indoor bouldering.
  • Validated markerless pipeline against a 2D video tool and IMUs for kinematic measurements.
  • Involved ten teenage athletes who performed 40 bouldering falls recorded with five cameras.
  • Used GoPro cameras and IMUs to measure displacement, velocity, and peak acceleration with specific cut-off frequencies.
  • Pose2Sim showed close agreement with Kinovea for fall height and velocity, with no significant differences.
  • Peak acceleration measurements were underestimated by the pipeline, though no significant difference was found at the forehead.
  • The findings suggest video analysis is valid for fall kinematics but highlight the need for IMUs to quantify impact intensity.

Abstract

Indoor bouldering is a popular and rapidly growing sport in which climbers fall repeatedly from walls up to 4–5 m high, making lower-limb injuries common. It is therefore essential to understand fall kinematics and impact conditions, yet fall kinematics remain poorly documented because laboratory motion capture is impractical in gyms. This study aimed to validate a markerless multi-camera pipeline (Pose2Sim) against a 2D video annotation tool (Kinovea) for displacement and velocity measurement, and against IMUs for peak acceleration. Ten teenage athletes (3 males, 7 females; 14–17 years) performed 40 falls recorded with five cameras (GoPro HERO12, USA, 2.7 K, 240 fps) and three IMUs (Blue Trident, Vicon, UK; ±200 g, 1600 Hz). Cut-off frequencies were set using Yu’s method (13 Hz for video, 39 Hz for IMUs). Pose2Sim’s results closely matched those of Kinovea for fall height and peak velocity with non-significant differences but underestimated peak acceleration. At the forehead, no significant difference was found, likely due to smaller accelerations at the head. Markerless video analysis is appropriate for studying fall kinematics and typology in indoor bouldering. IMUs remain necessary to quantify impact intensity, and future work should explore the combination of both IMUs and video to overcome this limitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carretier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706d13b6488063ad5c1dbfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s26020662
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper